You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: But the question is, how do you define popular will [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
terrell9584 Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. But the question is, how do you define popular will
Delegates or National Popular Vote. And what about FL and MI. I'll stand by the statement that at least Florida should count because that election followed what you would expect a Florida primary to look like. Michigan probably shouldn't without a revote, because I think Michigan probably in a competitive election would have been a three way split, or an Edwards/Obama battle.

North Carolina will be closer than everyone says, because there are many rural counties in the state where local offices end up in the hands of the Democratic Primary winner. Obama's victory would depend on winning the black vote and performing well with whites in the Triangle. The problem with this is, every single North Carolina poll I have seen shows between 15-20% undecided. I think in N.C, this is partially a reflection of continued support for Edwards (and his base was the Triangle) and partially, the undecideds serve as a screen for Clinton voters who don't want to tell pollsters they were Clinton voters. If you looked at most of the PA polls, and just the undecided margin, those undecideds broke for Clinton. Personally, I think they were with her all along but used undecided as a shield, and we may be seeing the same thing in North Carolina.

That being said, this has to play out. Obama's best chance of trying to hold a margin will be North Carolina. If he doesn't win by these gargantuan margins that every poll has him having (keep in mind with huge undecideds, I saw one poll with more than 20% in that camp), then it will be hard for him to maintain his margin if Clinton can pull off Indiana, because West Virginia and Kentucky will be Clinton's strongest states, she will pad her margin, and these are Southern states, rural voters in general have their local offices decided in Democratic primaries, so at primary time, they vote as Democrats. If Clinton keeps Obama within single digits in N.C, and this is possible given all of the undecideds, then essentially, any margin gain made there can probably be neutralized with a strong enough performance in KY and WV.

The other question is, do we include that which is not technically a state (Puerto Rico), but which, based on conventional wisdom, will probably provide a huge margin to Clinton.

It's why this all has to play out, because there are so many variables
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC