You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: Why an "automatic runoff" rather than the automatic recount current law provides [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Why an "automatic runoff" rather than the automatic recount current law provides
when the plarality margin is under half a percent (IIRC)?

Hand recounts cost 3 cents a ballot; how much would a runoff cost?

And would you exclude Barkley and write-ins from a runoff? Wouldn't that change the dynamics of the election entirely?

And what about turnout in a runoff? If turnoff drops dramatically from Election Day, why would the runoff be perceived as fairer than a hand recount of the original ballots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC