You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: Uuummmmm, I am agreeing with Romney? wha? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Massachusetts Donate to DU
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Uuummmmm, I am agreeing with Romney? wha?
Edited on Fri Aug-26-05 11:34 PM by TaleWgnDg
.
Uuummmmm, I am agreeing with Romney? wha? Say it isn't so!

Reilly, our astute and bright Attorney General, should pick up on this immediately and file a complaint in federal court in Boston or (if legally possible) join the lawsuit already pending in federal court in Pennsylvania. A federal judge in Pennsylvania today (Friday, August 26, 2005) ruled that the Department of Defense (DoD) recommendation to shut-down an Air National Guard unit in Pennsylvania was unconstitutional under our federal constitution and that such DoD recommendation is invalid unless it gets prior assent from the governor of Pennsylvania which it did not.

Yeah. Romney should pursue this about Otis' Massachusetts Air National Guard. OF COURSE HE SHOULD. As should Reilly when requested to do so. And if Romney doesn't want to pursue this legal tactic then Reilly should get very noisy and make hay out of it, political hay that is. After all, Reilly is running for governor in 2006.

Go get 'im, Tom!


prnewswire.com published a letter authored by Pennsylvania Governor Rendell to the Chairman of BRAC as a result of the Pennsylvania federal court order of August 26, 2005:

    August 26, 2005

    The Honorable Anthony J. Principi
    Chairman
    2005 Defense Base Closure Realignment Commission
    2521 S. Clark Street
    Suite 600
    Arlington, VA 22202

    Dear Chairman Principi:

    At approximately 1:30 p.m. today, the Honorable John R. Padova, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, issued a 54 page Opinion and Order in the case of Rendell, et al. v. Rumsfeld, Civil Action No. 05-CV-3563.

    In his Order, Judge Padova dismissed Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the action and granted the Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. Judge Padova's Order further provides: Secretary Rumsfeld, by designating the 111th Fighter Wing of the Pennsylvania Air National Guard without first obtaining the approval of Governor Rendell, has violated 32 U.S.C. s 104(c). The portion of the BRAC DoD Report that recommends deactivation of the 111th Fighter Wing of the Pennsylvania Air National Guard is null and void (emphasis added).

    Given Judge Padova's ruling, it was improper for the Commission to vote on that portion of the DoD recommendations dealing with the 111th. Clearly, the Commission could not consider a recommendation that, as a matter of law, was declared null and void by the Court. Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Commission acknowledge its inability to consider the 111th recommendation and rescind its decision today with respect to the 111th, its aircraft, and associated equipment.

    Sincerely yours,
    Edward G. Rendell
    Governor


http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/08-26-2005/0004095028&EDATE=
(any emphasis added in the above letter has been removed)


_________________________

edited to add: In determining the federal court challenges, AG Reilly should research Delahunt's legal suggestion (last paragraph) regarding BRAC's legal authority as granted by congress.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Places » Massachusetts Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC