You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Whether they're repub or dem remains to be determined.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
CaptainCorc Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Whether they're repub or dem remains to be determined....
maybe. Here's a link to an article which casts gloom on the prospect of getting those puppies counted. Note that this article is from the 15th and deals with a different court decision. The upshot of it is that the Washington State Supreme Court "rejected a lawsuit that would have required counties to reinspect more than 3,000 previously disqualified absentee and provisional ballots."

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/203826_governor15.html

Another snip:

In rejecting the Democrats' lawsuit yesterday, the high court ruled that under Washington law, "ballots are to be 'retabulated' only if they have been previously counted or tallied."

end snip

Now the word "tallied" is interesting here. I worked a little with Washington state elections and absentee voters are given credit for having voted even if their ballots don't count for some reason. Please don't ask me for the law behind that :). So if those 500 odd ballots have been "tallied" it may be possible that they'll be counted.

snip:

...the justices qualified that part of the ruling. State law also includes a provision that allows counties to fix errors, the justices wrote.

end snip

That seems significant to me because on these 500 odd ballots that were ruled on (negatively) today, the problem was that the election people did not go to the registration cards for signatures LIKE THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO. When they found the signatures were not in the computer database, they rejected the ballots. This, as I understand it, is a procedural error. (If you're confused about all this signature business I beg your pardon: absentee ballots are mailed in a special envelope that the voter signs in order to allow the election workers to compare the signature with one on record--either in a database or on a registration card--in order to verify that the sender is really the voter in question).

Well this has gotten long hasn't it? Sorry about that. :)

Oh and my apologies if I didn't handle the snipping right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC