You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Negative MSM stories are coming... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 02:14 AM
Original message
The Negative MSM stories are coming...
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Sun Dec-19-04 02:37 AM by dzika
I see a trend for some negative press during the first of the week.

Recounds in Ohio have gone "too well" and this will generate some negative stories.

Don't let the benign titles fool you.


Negative/Neutral stories posted in the past few hours:

Sunday, December 19, 2004
Voting in America: The flaws persist (The Roanoke Times)
http://www.roanoke.com/editorials%5C15627.html

Gender gap myths and legends (Washington Times)
http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20041218-100132-6503r.htm

We must get elections right (The Herald-Star, Steubenville, Ohio)
http://www.hsconnect.com/edit/story/1219202004_edtedit121904.asp

Recount gives Bush presidential election for third time
http://www.morningjournalnews.com/news/story/1218202004_new01news17.asp



Postive Media:

Ohio Election Officials Obstruct Recount
December 17, 2004
http://www.gp.org/press/pr_2004_12_17.html

-snip-
Reports from throughout Ohio present a clear and disturbing pattern
of state and local election officials obstructing the recount of
Ohio’s 2004 presidential vote, according to the Green Party’s
presidential campaign which initiated the recount and is monitoring
the process.

“Ohio election officials are violating both the spirit and the
letter of the law governing the recount,” said Cobb-LaMarche Media
Director Blair Bobier.

In two counties, Monroe and Fairfield, election officials have
refused to do a full hand recount, as required, when hand and
machine tallies don’t match. They have instead opted to get new
machines to count the votes


Middletown Journal
http://www.middletownjournal.com/opin/content/news/stories/2004/12/19/mj1219myview.html
My View column for Dec. 19, 2004

What’s the fuss in recounting the votes? In 2000 and now 2004, why
is it morally wrong to have integrity in the voting process in
America?

A move is taking place in Congress to give every American the
constitutional right to vote. Today, we have a state’s right to vote
which provides 50 separate and unequal laws and rules relative to
voting governed by 50 secretaries of state.

In this post-election season, the voters are seeking three basic
actions to dispel any notion of an unfair election: first, the
recount; secondly, an investigation of improprieties; and thirdly,
the reclusions of Ken Blackwell from the process. All are in the
name of integrity in our electoral process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC