You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #34: True, but we dont have to PROVE fraud for it to work for us. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
NationalEnquirer Donating Member (571 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
34. True, but we dont have to PROVE fraud for it to work for us.
I don't think we are going to convince anyone else out there about fraud, but we CAN convince (like ya'll did me :) ) that because of the STINK out there (likely or possible fraud) we need to reform the election system.
In other words, I dont have to CONVINCE anyone out there that Fraud occurred for sure, but I always get them to admit that maybe it did, and that should be enough.
No one I talk with disagrees with vote reform, and yet very few of them are convinced of fraud.
But the idea that it may have occurred is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC