You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: IL: A better way to touch and go [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-21-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
31. IL: A better way to touch and go
The Courier News

• Local invention: Voting machine avoids errors by generating paper record, too



By Mike Sullivan
staff writer

ELGIN — Although Sanford Morganstein received votes of confidence from the corporate world for inventing the automated telephone attendant and runs a Chicago-based software development firm, he's not about to rest on his laurels.

At age 62, Sandy, as he prefers to be called, has drawn on his background as a physicist to develop the Populex Digital Paper Ballot, an invention that, based on early returns, would likely get Al Gore's vote.

President and founder of Elgin-based Populex Corp., Morganstein readily admits his invention is not the only machine using computer-based touch screen technology.

Rival companies in Texas and Nebraska also are vying for contracts from election officials, having been certified to sell its machines in Illinois and five other states.

But unlike most other touch-screen systems, Morganstein noted, the Populex electronically records and then prints a voter-verifiable paper ballot card.

The final ballot, he explained, contains a bar code that is scanned to record and count the votes on election day.

Morganstein says he was asked by an election official to work on a touch-screen system following the debacle of the 2000 presidential election, notorious for its hanging chads during Florida recounts as the nation waited weeks to find out who was elected.

Morganstein said he forged ahead with one basic premise in mind: Touch-screen systems that record votes electronically, he reasoned, are subject to computer malfunctions that likely would cause errors in tabulation.

http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/couriernews/business/3_3_EL21_POPULEX_S1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC