Reply #14: Thanks for the post, but I'm conflicted [View All]

[edwardsfeingold08]

Just because the vote wasn't successfully stolen in 2006, really doesn't convince me that 2000, 2002, and 2004 were free from computer fraud.

Since you're so knowledgeable, can you compare voting machines to ATM machines? How come bank machines are so free from errors and voting machines are so prone to errors. I mean if I take $100 from my checking account at an ATM, it always takes $100 out of my checking. I never have to go back and make corrections. But, when I'm using a touch screen voting machine and I touch John Kerry and it registers George Bush, what the heck is that? Why am I not to think there is malicious intent? Clearly, Diebold makes ATM machines and they have the ability to make a working machine? Am I just to believe they can make a bank machine work, but are incapable of making a working voting machine? It just doesn't make sense to me.