You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #104: It is not a "belief" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
_ed_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #49
104. It is not a "belief"
Edited on Tue Oct-12-10 12:13 PM by _ed_
It is a statement of evidence. There is no evidence for the existence of god(s). You can't be a fundamentalist about a lack of evidence.

Do you call scientists who study the cosmos "fudamentalist astronomers" if they criticize astrology? Would you call a chemist a "fundamentalist chemist" if they criticize alchemy? Is saying that there is no scientific evidence for alchemy or astrology being a "fundamentalist" about science?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC