You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: A good article? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. A good article?
Edited on Wed Apr-26-06 09:08 AM by symbolman
I think that any person would learn more from reading a Phone Book, and not needlessly suffer from the sheer HATE represented in this "article"..

America is full of opinions. Mine is that this person who wrote this is a FOOL. They seem to have NO IDEA HOW to even write an "editorial", more like the blathering of a high school dork..

Tunnel Vision?

How do you feel about the KKK? Shouldn't THEY get a shot at writing for Raw Story, since RS is so happy to allow any sort of hate speech for fear of "silencing" anyone..

THEY allowed THEIR columnist to write this nasty ass crap, THEY are responsible, if it was on this person's OWN blog then it's that person's responsibility..

They call themselves a NEWS org, until they get caught, then it's an "editorial", and they will come here and GNAW a face off if anyone insults their site, which I do regualarly, I don't like what they do, so I get BIT when I speak up.. I get accused of having "attack dogs" when others disagree with what SOME Raw STORY "employee" says here..

But MAN, watch them SCURRY when they get CAUGHT, as far as I'm concerned RS is just goddamn SLIPPERY and has NO ethics, I just see them rewriting AP or other stories, and then blaming AP for the similarities, or Reuters.. they seem to have a News FEED line, so they'd get it quicker than you do, and if they rewrite it and call it THEIR NEWS, then who will KNOW? I might, and I think that's what's happening..

Later when the WaPO (who wrote it originally, before the RS rewrite got spawned online) RS then USES the WaPO story as "PROOF" that THEY "broke" the story and it has integrity..all the while screaming that the corporate media is NOT to be trusted, this is done as a marketing aid for their plethora of ads that bitchslap a person who is curious enough to show up there at all.. and LOOK at all the money in those same ads for CORPORATIONS..

I've seen this over and over, and as a NEWS type org ourselves we're pretty sure when this type of thing is going on, altho it's not so obvious to the average person who may be getting FOOLED.

Tunnel Vision? Seriously, you HAVE to be kidding.. ALL opinions are valid? How about child molesters? Should RS give THEM a Platform?

C'mon.. I will defend to the death your right to these opinions, but I refuse to believe them..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC