Reply #44: Failure of intelligence community? I think not. There is simply too... [View All]

[FighttheFuture]

many damming stories about Cheney and his (Rummy's) "Office of Special Plans" not only cherry picking data favorable to their agenda, but quashing evidence to the contrary. Valarie Plame is just a very public example of this. Casting 9/11 in the same light as Peal Harbor is simply not supported by the evidence and is, I feel, a foolish mistake that many make.

A quick perusal of Google shows Mother Jones with a very good article about this, http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2004/01/12_405.html">The Lie Factory. Of course, there are many more to be found such as the damming facts of whistle blower FBI agent Cathleen Rowley or the quashed testimony of FBI translator Sibel Edmonds. These are just off the top of my head. Do a google and enjoy!

You conflate past Presidents policies and unproven to-this-day rumor-mongering of FDR and Pearl harbor (very well refuted, BTW) into this gang of criminals' increasingly documented damming actions at all our peril! The facts keep on pointing ever closer to one conclusion: conspiracy to commit treason.


P.S. A very good refutation of the FDR/Pearl Harbor can be found here at http://www.winstonchurchill.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=951">“Churchill and Roosevelt knew about Pearl Harbor in advance”. Now can you ever disprove FDR had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor? Of course, not, you cannot disprove a negative. Yet, given that he is one of our country's greatest presidents, along with Lincoln and Washington, I'll take the chance of supporting him and giving him the benefit of doubt. Contrast that with anyone, at this point with all we have been through so far, that gives Bush and Bu$hitCo a free pass, however minor, would simply be a fool to do so!!