You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: It means no such thing [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It means no such thing
Blaming the public would be absurd. Newspaper publishers and upper-level editors poll, survey and otherwise gauge their paper's readership in an effort to achieve some editorial balance — which usually isn't "balance" at all, but skewed compromise. The degree of skew usually depends on the aforementioned suits' personal opinions.

More so than readers, though, publishers and upper-level editors are afraid of offending advertisers, since they pay the bills.

There's no conspiracy here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC