You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: I think you are right. They wanted it to pass, despite all the [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think you are right. They wanted it to pass, despite all the
qualms, and all the candidates voted no because they did not want another vote like the Iraq war vote which would haunt them, so there was, as you say, vote-swapping of some kind. Rookie senators who could stomach it were chosen, I am sure, because they are not up for a reelection for a long time -- that explains, Webb, McCaskill, and Klobuchar -- and Reid made sure that in the end there would be 60 for, and that also explains why Landrieu kept changing her vote -- hoping, maybe, that she can vote "nay" but then her vote was needed for 60. Reid orchestrated it to give themselves cover for why no one is filibustering but then he still wanted to appear to be critical of it. And Mikulski is both safe and loyal plus they thought it was so unusual for her, it just won't stick. Don't blame the senators who voted for it -- some of them fell on their swords for the party. They are all responsible. One word: cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC