You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: Things Things Need A More General Spread To Work Properly, Ma'am [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Things Things Need A More General Spread To Work Properly, Ma'am
Afghanistan faced then, and for that matter faces now, several very pressing problems, chiefly rebuilding homes, establishing communications infrastructure, and the predominance of private tribal armies over national forces. All of these are susceptible to money. The private armies pay their men, and while it is not much, it pays better than farming by a long sight. If government sponsored construction work payed twice what the private armies can pay, and service in the national army paid four times what private army service paid, the private armies would melt away, to their merest cores of kinship among bandits.

My inclination was, and is, to completely disregard the reported 'overtures' of the Taliban leadership in September on those lines. There is not the slightest reason to suspect they were sincere, and every reason to believe they were mere posturings for propaganda and to perhaps delay the inevitable a little longer. It is a pretty standard move, after all. Once the jet-lines struck the buildings, there really was no other course events could have taken in regard to the country in which that operation was based. Ghandi himself, were he President of the United States at that time, would have had to give the order for attack, if he wished to renain in office: the people here would not have stood for anything short of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC