You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wall Street Needs Social Security (SS) Money Far More Than SS Needs To Be Privitized [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 05:56 PM
Original message
Wall Street Needs Social Security (SS) Money Far More Than SS Needs To Be Privitized
Advertisements [?]
A thought occured to me the other day. There's a strong reason why the markets have returned consistently higher gains in the last 25 years or so. It's called demographics. Starting in 70s, baby boomers became professional workers, and then in the 80s, they started investing in the markets as a means to save for their retirement. Literally, since the 1980s, the bond and stock markets have been mostly a bir retirement fund for the baby boomers, for no other instruments are even available that can return enough money for retirement, esp. as corporations have stopped offering pension plans.

This current system is all well and good until the demographics shift. When the boomers start retiring, they will take their money out of the markets. The largest generation, population-wise, will all start to pull their money out of stocks and bonds and live on cash to pay their retirement costs as well as their health care in retirement. This will create a huge drain on the market. It will make stocks and bonds prices plummet.

The markets need a huge infusion of cash from somwhere to make up for the baby boomers pulling out of it. Enter SS privitization. Now, we're told over and over again that SS is in trouble because there will be more retirees than workers paying into the system. This is the doomsday scenario that the think tanks have peddled through the media. What they haven't told you is that this anamoly in the system was addressed years ago by a hike in the payroll tax in the 1980s which created a SS surplus. This surplus was even bigger during the Clinton years. Recall the much ridiculed Gore lockbox This surplus was big enough to overcome the anamoly.

However, the SS surpluses were raided by Reagan and Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. These tax cuts were never enacted to help the wealthy. Rather, they were enacted to destroy SS. Thus, creating the need for privitization, which is nothing more than another Wall Street bailout scheme.

Correct me if I am wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC