You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #62: if the U.S. can elect a sane person... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
62. if the U.S. can elect a sane person...
and have sane people in the pentagon, it would seem to be in Iran's interests to negotiate a new nuclear agreement with the U.S. Obviously we are armed to the teeth...and in fact, I believe we were the nation that first stopped honoring the nuclear test ban treaty. Isn't that the case?

And really, wouldn't Iran be likely to seek a cordial relationship with the U.S. since bin Laden is Sunni? I mean, why wouldn't Iran want the U.S. to do its fighting for them since the def. contractors are the U.S. export economy. (snark)

Thanks so much for your analysis of the situation. Sounds right to me, considering the reportage of Sy Hersh (osp and abu ghraib and Laura Rozen (Franklin, the Italian job) and the exit of so many.

I do hope Bush/Cheney are sidelined for the good of this nation. I'm waiting until 9-17 to see if Cheney is still kicking. That would be so sweet- if he decided to "retire."

The gay blogger guy also has more right wingers he intends to out. With these various events, hopefully the testosterone level of the R. party will plummet so far they
won't even have cojones. As far as winning an election (not governing, imo) this would help get rid of r's in the exec. and legis. branches.

I would like Bugliosi to reopen the impeachment case against Scalia..Thomas and Kennedy too. Rehnquist and O'Connor have retired, but they would be a part of any such action for the history books. Barring that, Scalia has spoken on the record about his theocratic views and has called democracy "the problem" when executing ppl in a democracy. yeesh. Unfortunately, Bush left us with a supreme court that I'm not too confident about, as far as our status as a non-theocratic nation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC