You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #92: One question, though, bigtree: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
92. One question, though, bigtree:
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 12:00 PM by tom_paine
Why is it that the Bushies, in similar constarints, lacking votes to convict and even lacking a case with any legal merit, a case in which more felonious and RICO activity was performed in setting Clinton's "perjury trap" than he committed in his answers or his actions (a consensual office BJ), why is it they were able to tie the nation in knots?

Come to think of it, here's another: How is it possible that Democratic Bills take 60 votes to pass but Bushie Bills take 50 EVERY TIME NOW?

(please don't lecture me about filibusters, I am looking for the deeper layers of the onion here than a simple civics lesson, I know the mechanics of what is happening, but WHY?)


If you can answer these questions to even a tiny bit of my satisafction (it has to make sense, and be bolstered by either direct evidence or logical analogies and examples...no ad hominem, please or this converstaion is over), I may lend some creedence to your opinion, which is obviously shared by half or more of DU, I would guess.

So convince me. Why is it the Republics, in the exact same sitauation 10 years ago, without even a case that passed the smell test of remotest crtiminal importance, were able to carry off what is apparently impossible for the Democratic Leadership, or anything even close to it, in terms of political resistance, come to think of it?

Convince me. Explain why cogently and clearly this seeming Orwellian/Totalitarian Double-Standard, makes sense in the context of the Old American Constitutional System, of Checks and Balances, as written and as practiced in the years 1945-1985?

Do that, and you will have gone a long way towards making me scratch my head and re-examine my 90% certainty.

I just don't think you will be able to. No one has, and I have been asking some variant of this same question since I joined DU in April 2001, probably a thousand times or more.

Hell, I can't even remember anyone TRYING to explain it. It's such a conversation killer, usually.

Anyway, please feel free to take a shot and convince me. I will try to keep an open mind and listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC