You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: I don't think wood is appropriate for cities. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I don't think wood is appropriate for cities.
Way too many people concentrated into a small area, too many fires would be necessary. Perhaps some use of masonry stoves might work to heat multiple unit buildings; those are quick, very hot fires that use little fuel but give off heat for many hours afterwards.

There's probably something more efficient for heating many dwellings crowded close together, though.

I don't live in the city, and I burn wood that would have been burned by the forest service anyway; burned in the open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC