You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #34: Civil debate? In the DU? Someone's sure to alert this, but I thank you [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Civil debate? In the DU? Someone's sure to alert this, but I thank you
Signing statements - As far as I know, Bush is the first president to use signing statements to undermine a law duly passed by Congress and signed by the president on the grounds that the law violates the Constitution. According to the American Bar Association, "a President's issuance of a signing statement to claim the authority or state the intention to disregard or decline to enforce all or part of a law he has signed, or to interpret such a law in a manner inconsistent with the clear intent of Congress" is unconsititutional. Other presidents have issued signing statements, but no other president has issued a signing statement like Bush's.

Pelosi's oath of office - "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God." Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 of the Consitution states "The House of Representatives shall choose their speaker and other officers; and shall have the sole power of impeachment." For the Speaker of the House to declare that a power of Congress expressly granted to the House is "off the table" is a failure to discharge the duties of the office and a violation of her oath.

High crimes and misdemeanors - I tend to agree with Doug Feith on this (which kills me to do), but he said something to the effect that high crimes and misdemeanors are whatever the House thinks the Senate can prove. Presidental usurpation of Congressional power (i.e. signing statments that clearly negate a duly passed law) is a high crime against the Constitution itself.

It's not up to the Courts to try the President, it's up to the Senate. The Constitution gives the Senate the sole power to try all impeachments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC