You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: Actually no it's not silly at all [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Actually no it's not silly at all
http://askville.amazon.com/official-death-count-soldiers-Iraq-died-result-happened/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=1081265&search=soldiers%2Bwho%2Bdon%27t%2Bdie%2Bin%2Biraq%2Bnot%2Bcounted

http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a1669.htm

Casualties whose next-of-kin are not notified or cannot be contacted/located do not therefore appear to be counted in the official tally.

Additionally, an April 27, 2004, story titled "The Lasting Wounds Of War: Roadside Bombs Have Devastated Troops and Doctors Who Treat Them" by Karl Vick and published in the Washington Post, page 1, mentioned instances where US casualties, having suffered extensive brain-damage and with no prospect of regaining consciousness, are sent home for families to decide whether or not to terminate life support . . . It is not immediately apparent the extent to which these casualties are accounted for in the official DoD casualties count.
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/10/us-death-toll-in-iraq-higher-than-you.html

It is incomprehensible that the Democratic leadership, after 30 months of war and occupation in Iraq, has not challenged the Bush administration’s deliberate low-balling of U.S. casualties in Iraq (not to mention refusing even to estimate the Iraqi civilian losses).

The Department of Defense counts as official casualties the fatality toll, but only those injuries incurred in combat operations. This criteria leaves out thousands of serious injuries, thousands of cases of disease (such as sandfly disease) and tens of thousands of disabling post-traumatic-stress disorders.

As demonstrated by a “60 Minutes” program on CBS last December, permanently and seriously disabled soldiers were very upset that they weren’t even counted. Messrs. Bush and Rumsfeld should know how this definitional omission, clearly designed to diminish public indignation and polls against this illegal, costly, destructive, false-pretense military invasion and occupation, disrespects those military families.

Three soldiers in a Humvee were traveling toward their mission, tipped over and slid into the Euphrates River. Why wasn’t the soldier, now a quadriplegic, counted by Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld in the official toll?

The actual injury numbers are almost three times the official count. Then there are the soldiers with diseases and serious mental damage.

http://thehill.com/letters/victims-families-speak-for-themselves-on-death-penalty-2005-11-10.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC