Reply #58: You are right about this point [View All]

[Vinnie From Indy]

As far as I can tell, the Senators, the IG and others have only found credible Edmonds claims about mismanagement of her department and some misconduct by some co-workers. I have not seen any evidence that these supporters are signing on to her claims about treason by officials at the highest level of our government.

In short, simply because her claims that her department in the FBI was being mismanaged and that some of her co-workers may have been guilty of misconduct DOES NOT prove that ALL of her subsequent and additional claims are true by a long shot.

I will add that I am a bit skeptical that Edmonds could have gleaned so much information as a translator in just SIX months on the job as well as being the target for recruitment into the very spy network she was reading about in the documents she was reading at the FBI.

Also, why did she wait until 2004 to offer that the FBI had been given DETAILED information about Osama Bin Laden's attack on 9/11. She had made claims prior to that date. Why did she wait to drop that bombshell?

Why did she wait until recently to offer that the documents she was reading at the FBI implicated Rep. Shakowski of being involved with a female Turkish agent? Why didn't she offer this in 2004 when she dropped the OSama bombshell?