You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #50: I just want to know why he's taking such flak when he was never in [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-01-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
50. I just want to know why he's taking such flak when he was never in
charge of the Intelligence Committee "when it mattered" - that is, when all this shit was first going down, and ANYONE even nominally against it was shouted down, called names, shunted to the side, and certainly not given much if any coverage to present his or her view. There was a republi-CON named pat roberts, of Kansas, who was in charge of this committee, who got the most inside info because this White House for the LONGEST time ONLY briefed its own and people like Dick Durbin were left out in the cold because they had a "D" after their names. And pat roberts did nothing but cover up and sweep stuff under the rug and obstruct and lie and string things out and bait and switch. And WHERE IS HE NOW???? How come nobody's jumping down his throat???

If you want to distribute blame, let's not heap it all on Dick Durbin, okay? Yeah, certainly he could have spoken out, but how much would anyone besides people like us here have paid any attention to him, or given a second-and-a-half to anything he was saying??? NOBODY who tried to speak out got a fair shake. He would have opened his mouth and tried to object and he would have been almost literally RUN OVER and burned in effigy. ANYTHING he would have tried to do, and many of them - like him - DID try, wouldn't have gone ANYWHERE. Certainly it wouldn't have gotten any coverage, nowhere near any "equal time" - which back then was being offered exclusively to bush-fans and bush-backers. Besides, he wasn't in any position to do anything about it, anyway, not being chairman of any committee, not having subpoena power, not being in the majority and being able to help set the agenda. Democrats were ground into the dirt for the last too-many years, ONLY UP TIL JANUARY.

I'm glad he's finally speaking out. At least now, he's in a position to be able to do something about it. And it's not anywhere near as significant as if tenet had grown some nads and spoken out, too. tenet would have been in a position to do something, make some noise, attract some attention to himself, maybe even stall the juggernaut for awhile. People, critics, the media, even other republi-CONS would have HAD to pay at least some attention to a george tenet. Dick Durbin they would have scoffed at, as they did when ANY Democrat back then tried to show some fortitude. I hope we haven't forgotten how horrible, sad, hopeless, and barren those times were - THIS soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC