You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #118: let's say that is true [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
William Z. Foster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #117
118. let's say that is true
If what you are saying is true, then smoking should be banned or the use controlled in a similar way to firearms or automobiles - for public safety. That has already happened for the most part. That still does not address the regressive taxation issue. You are saying that regressive taxation is OK if it achieves good social ends. But that is always the argument used to defend regressive taxation.

Taxation is not about generating revenue? Then it is about punishing people? Micro-managing people's behavior? Controlling them? Deciding what is best for them? I support your crusade to stop smoking. I do not support your recommended method - regressive taxation.

I really do have to object to the argument that "the public is footing the bill for people's bad choices." I argued with representative Stupak about this the other day in regards to the health care bill. He defended it and said that the purpose was to solve the problem of poor people not having insurance, and therefore being a burden on the rest of us when they got sick or went to the emergency room. It is the damned poor people who are the problem - they aren't pulling their weight and aren't making the right choices like we nice middle class people are!! In other words, rather than the social problems being immigration, or smoking, or lack of access to health care, or lack of access to the best food at affordable prices being seen as the problem, we are to see the individual people as the problem - they are obese, they don't have health care, they are drinking soda pop, they are smoking, they don't have their documents in order. That leads us to pass legislation aimed at the people, always the poorer people, rather than attacking the problem.

If you want to blame, control, and punish the working people, that is fine. Many people do, and that is the main reason that Palin's phony "get the government off our backs" populism resonates with the public. Let's dispense with the "it's for their own good!" hypocrisy, though, and don't then be surprised when this all leads to a police state that may some day bite YOU in the ass, when the Republicans are back in power, and don't be surprised when the strategy of trying to be "just as tough as the Republicans!" leads to the Democratic party being out of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC