You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FILTER THE CHEMICAL SOUP IN NEW JERSEY’S DRINKING WATER [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 10:45 AM
Original message
FILTER THE CHEMICAL SOUP IN NEW JERSEY’S DRINKING WATER
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Tue Sep-07-10 10:46 AM by ensho

http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=1397


New Jersey should filter its drinking water to remove hundreds of chemicals, most of which are unregulated, from its drinking water supply, according to a rulemaking petition filed today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). The plan to screen many chemicals out of tap water was actually developed by the state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) but has been in limbo for the last six years.

State testing has detected “approximately 600” chemical compounds “in 199 samples collected” including five brands of bottled water, according to a recent DEP white paper. The vast majority of these chemicals, including pharmaceuticals, hormones, and cleaning products, are not regulated by either the federal or state government. As a result, there is no regulatory effort to reduce or eliminate them from drinking water.

The April 2010 DEP white paper, entitled “Investigations Related to a ‘Treatment-Based’ Regulatory Approach to Address Unregulated Contaminants in Drinking Water,” advocates used granular activated carbon filtration and other techniques to remove most chemicals in drinking water, noting that carbon filtration alone removed more than half of identified chemicals.

“Pre-treatment of drinking water is not a panacea but would be a major step forward,” stated New Jersey PEER Director Bill Wolfe, a former DEP analyst, noting that no single technique or combination of techniques will filter all chemicals out of drinking water. “The alternative is having the public serve as a chemical sponge for hundreds of unregulated compounds coming out of our spigots every day.”
-snip-
----------------------------

jeez Louise

they have to do something because in N.J. the underground water is forever contaminated.

babies, kids and preg. women are drinking that stuff and suffering the consequences.

**************

and

**************

http://atlantaprogressivenews.com/news/0683.html

Advocates Claim Atlanta Violating Safe Drinking Water Act

A group of Atlanta neighborhood activists have been engaged in a years-long battle to get the City of Atlanta to seek a permit for the shafts--through which waste water is sent into deep underground tunnels--something they believe is a requirement of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act.

The tunnels go long distances to treatment plants, where the water is treated at the surface and then is discharged to a river or stream.

The first problem is that non-drinkable water, including sewage, is not supposed to be injected underground into tunnels, according to the Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Section 144.12, "Prohibition of movement of fluid into underground sources of drinking water."

-snip-

Advocates are particularly concerned about the part of Atlanta's sewer system which is combined, meaning that sewage and stormwater travel in the same tunnel to the treatment plant.
-snip-
------------------------

they also said that some of the tunnels were never given a permit.

Obama and Team's money for redoing sewer/water/etc. will hopefully help Atlanta and N.J.

just because your drinking water looks clear doesn't mean is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC