You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: Grayson won in 2008 and lost in 2010 because the people who were [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Grayson won in 2008 and lost in 2010 because the people who were
motivated by president Obama couldn't be bothered to go to the polls in 2010.

That, my Friend, is not the fault of the party that is the fault of president Obama for the way he started off his administration by not engaging his own party but by trying to transcend party lines.

His approach left guys like Grayson swinging in the wind because they did not strengthen ties to the party.

The party is the president, whether you like it or not. People identify the person in office as the the head of the party.

And the party leader is the president but he left his people swinging in the wind many times during the health care debate which was what defined his presidency up until now.

All those people who wanted an overhaul of their health care, because that was a huge part of why people voted for candidate Obama, were left bewildered by the action of the president. Part of the reason was, as I stated above, president Obama seemed to be more interested in making a deal with the GOP than building a party consensus in the House and the Senate.

As far as Grayson goes, in 2008 he won 172,854 to 159,490 with a total turnout of 332,344.

In 2010. Grayson lost 84,167 to 123,586. The turnout dropped by 112,110 votes. If the party in the district would have been able to reach out to those 112,000 people who couldn't be bothered to come to vote just two years later, Grayson would still be in office. A lot of that has to do with president Obama not living up to the expectations of those who turned out in 2008.

So why did all those people who voted for Grayson in 2008 not even bother to show up in 2010?

Because the district is normally republican and the GOP, as a party, had worked to identify president Obama and the Party as this side of being commies.

Don't know if you are even bothering to read this, but Grayson really didn't have a chance. It took an historically high turnout, which was caused by Obama AND the tired view the people had of the GOP, for him to win. If president Obama had identified himself more as a democrat and not basically left the party on it's own, perhaps there could have been a chance to build a lasting coalition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC