You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: Over-capacity? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
bdf Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Over-capacity?
Back when the CEGB (Central Electricity Generating Board of England and Wales, later sold off by Thatcher) ran things, they had a lot of over-capacity. And they knew the thermal efficiency of each and every boiler/generator set. They always arranged things so that the most efficient of them provided base-line power. As conditions required, they'd bring up systems in efficiency order. Not for surges when the adverts were shown during soap operas and people put the kettle on, because it takes around an hour to bring conventional systems up to steam. The CEGB used the most accurate weather predictions they could get so they could bring plant on-line to cope (takes an hour, remember). They didn't run more plant than absolutely necessary.

So yes, the US may well have plenty of spare capacity but a lot of it will be inefficient. As I said in my original post, global climate change and peak oil are crises in the making—we can't really afford to throw inefficient coal/oil systems at the nuclear problem without exacerbating other problems.

You have a touching faith in our ability to get all the timing right. How many Republicans in Congress are climate change deniers? How many refuse to believe that peak oil is coming? How many are voting for economic policies that will make the current depression worse and increase unemployment whilst lying their socks off by claiming those policies will decrease unemployment? How many Republicans voted down more funding for renewable energy? How many Republicans are, even now, demanding more nuclear power (so, to my disgust, is Obama).

Time to look into the past. In 1956, Shell geologist M King Hubbert came up with the theory of peak oil and predicted that the US would switch from being a nett exporter of oil to a nett importer of oil in the mid-1970s. Other geologists in the oil industry laughed at him. As it happens, his prediction was wrong: the US hit its peak production in the early 70s which triggered a crisis when OPEC held the US to ransom. That was when geologists realized that Hubbert had been right and that global peak oil would happen around now. Did anybody do anything about it? Carter put solar panels on the white house roof and Reagan took them off.

Yet you're confident we'll have storage soon enough after we've implemented renewables? Even if you were right that we can and would do it quickly, we need storage at the same time as renewables otherwise we have to keep all the conventional plant running at night, when the sun don't shine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC