You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #30: Details, details [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
bdf Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Details, details
I'm aware that continent-wide wind farms connected by a super-grid can even out wind power. Neither the continent-wide farms nor the super-grid yet exist in the US or anywhere else, although some of Europe has plans on the drawing board. And, from a quick skim, the IEEE paper you cited appears only to deal with wind power, not solar.

The IEEE paper also goes into economics about how much storage would be required in various scenarios but gives no details of how such storage could be implemented. I know of the hollowed-out mountain in Wales used for pumped storage to take care of 5-minute peaks during adverts in popular soap operas when people put the kettle on. That was a big, expensive project. So if wind needs storage, it's going to be costly and take years to implement even with better technologies.

One thing that worries me about the "best electrical engineers in the world" is their bald statement that 1kw-hour of wind power displaces 1kw-hour of conventional power. This is absolutely untrue if the wind power is so irregular that you need to supplement it with conventional power. It takes around 1 hour to bring conventional plant to steam, the fuel burnt during that hour being wasted. Having conventional plant at steam but doing nothing wastes the fuel its burning. Small surges in demand or drops in wind can be met with gas turbines, but unless you can guarantee year-round wind capability (whether that requires storage or not) then 1kw-hour of wind does not replace 1kw-hour of conventional power. Their economics may work when the full system is implemented but breaks badly in the years (decades) it will take to implement.

As for solar, I'm aware that it gets dark at night. Admittedly load in many industrialized countries is higher during the day due to heavy machinery. However, some countries promote the use of storage heaters (called heat banks in Australia) which run during the night-time off-peak period, and that would have to change.

I've seen several proposals for solar storage but none seem to have gone further than proof of concept models. All the proposals I've seen for renewable sources include solar as well as wind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC