You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: K&R. Shocking facts we wish we didn't know. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R. Shocking facts we wish we didn't know.
The benevolent seeming easy natural gas on the TV commercials make no mention of needing to shoot millions of gallons of carcinogens into the ground to force the stuff up.

Solar seems far less expensive when these ugly facts about easy natural gas are taken into account. When we learn that natural gas producers needed an EXEMPTION to the Safe Drinking Water Act to get their product out of the ground.

780 million gallons of drilling fluids containing roughly 750 different chemicals over a four year period? Sounds like a way to diversify the liability among a broader group. Can't sue one particular producer because hundreds of chemicals were used. Can't be sure where the increased cancer rates are coming from because it could be several of the cocktail chemicals.

If the safety of our fellow citizens and their children were the main concern, the number and type of chemicals used would be much more restricted and carefully monitored. But it seems like the liability of the natural gas industry has been the primary concern.

We've done more reckless things like this because it is considered a basic bottom line that the USA will do whatever is necessary to generate more fossil fuels because we need the energy.

And solar is "too expensive." It is only "too expensive" for the oil companies and nuclear industry because it could cut into their profits in a minor way. It is only too expensive if compared to old fossil fuels and dangerous monopoly energy sources with their exemptions from liability, with the public picking up the tabs for their massive spills and gallons of poisons used to sustain them.

Solar is only "too expensive" if public health is devalued in the equation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC