Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Spy Agency Reform Thrown Into Doubt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 04:31 PM
Original message
Spy Agency Reform Thrown Into Doubt
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 04:34 PM by cal04
An agreement reached on Saturday by congressional negotiators on post-Sept. 11 intelligence reforms was thrown into doubt by resistance by some Republicans in the House of Representatives. Proponents hoped to win passage of a bill creating a new national intelligence director post in the final hours of the 108th Congress. Failure to do so would require lawmakers to start over again when the 109th Congress convenes in January. "It's up in the air," several House Republicans leaving a closed-door meeting to discuss the measure told reporters.

Senate Governmental Affairs Committee (news - web sites) Chairman Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, and Sen. Joseph Lieberman (news, bio, voting record) of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the panel, said a majority of Senate negotiators had signed off on the deal. The compromise with the House would give the intelligence director significant budget authority but it would be less sweeping than the authority originally sought by the Senate and Sept. 11 Commission, which investigated the attacks.

House Speaker Dennis Hastert backed the deal, said the Illinois Republican's spokesman John Feehery. Negotiators said President Bush (news - web sites) also supports it. But Rep. Deborah Pryce (news, bio, voting record) of Ohio, following the meeting of House Republicans, said, "It's kind of dicey."

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=615&u=/nm/20041120/pl_nm/security_congress_dc&printer=1

Intelligence Overhaul Deal Falls Through
Congress on Saturday failed in its attempt to get legislation addressing the Sept. 11 Commission's terror-fighting recommendations to President Bush (news - web sites), but Republican leaders said they would try to press the effort later this year.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=512&ncid=716&e=3&u=/ap/20041120/ap_on_go_co/congress_intelligence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helnwhls Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. When I tell friends about
the CIA loyalty oaths and all that, THEY DO NOT BELIEVE ME! I have had three people think I am making this up. It is that willful ignorance, again. People can not accept what is happening. I am feeling kinda like changing my name to Cassandra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What CIA loyalty oath?
(Haven't been listening to the news.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helnwhls Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. this is what I am referencing
Loyalty oath is extreme, but it sounds like where they are heading.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=996755

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What r u talking about CIA loyalty oath? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helnwhls Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Here is the article and a DU discussion
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 04:48 PM by helnwhls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. ah, the new goon squad, be a goon or u be gone soon...ty n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. tempted to say, "punch 'em in throat, wipe their face with those articles"
i'm getting very sick and tired of willful ignorance myself. but must adhere to my non-violence values.

ps: maybe kicking them in the shins and slapping their face with the articles is acceptable, i'll have to meditate on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Article on Yahoo title now changed to Rebellious Republicans
Rebellious Republicans Derail 9/11 Reform

In a defeat for President Bush (news - web sites), rebellious House Republicans on Saturday derailed legislation to overhaul the nation's intelligence agencies along lines recommended by the Sept. 11 commission. "It's hard to reform. It's hard to make changes," said Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., who sought unsuccessfully to persuade critics among the GOP rank and file to swing behind the measure.

Hastert's decision to send lawmakers home without a vote drew attacks from Democrats, and capped an unpredictable day in which prospects for enactment of the measure seemed to grow, then diminish, almost by the hour. He left open the possibility of summoning lawmakers back in session early next month.

As approved by key negotiators, the White House and the bipartisan the 9-11 commission, the compromise would create a powerful position to oversee the CIA (news - web sites) and several other nonmilitary spy agencies. A new national counterterrorism center would coordinate the fight against foreign terrorists.

Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites) both contacted congressional negotiators by phone in hopes of nailing down an acceptable compromise that could clear Congress in the final hours of a postelection session. But Reps. Duncan Hunter and Jim Sensenbrenner, chairmen of the Armed Services and Judiciary committees, raised objections. Officials said Hunter, R-Calif., expressed concerns that provisions of the bill could interfere with the military chain of command and endanger troops in the field. Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., wanted additional provisions dealing with immigration, these officials said.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=2&u=/ap/20041120/ap_on_go_co/congress_intelligence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC