Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP,pg1: 2 Stem Cell Options Presented: Human Embryos Wouldn't Be Killed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 05:50 AM
Original message
WP,pg1: 2 Stem Cell Options Presented: Human Embryos Wouldn't Be Killed
2 Stem Cell Options Presented
Human Embryos Wouldn't Be Killed

By David Brown
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, December 4, 2004; Page A01


The panel of experts that advises President Bush on bioethical issues heard descriptions yesterday of two new laboratory techniques that may give scientists a way to get large numbers of medically promising stem cells without creating or killing human embryos.

The two proposals were greeted enthusiastically, with several panel members saying the techniques, still in the experimental stage, may hold the promise of solving one of the most contentious bioethical dilemmas of the past decade....

***

In one technique, scientists would harvest viable cells from embryos created to treat infertility but which have stopped developing and are functionally dead. Taking the cells -- which can grow into stem cells -- would be analogous to removing organs of brain-dead accident victims for transplant.

In the second technique, scientists would intentionally sabotage a cloning process called "nuclear transfer" so that the resulting bundle of cells is not an embryo but still has stem cell precursors. They could then be removed and used.

The purported advantage of both techniques is that neither involves an embryo with the potential for growth. In the first, the embryo has already died; in the second, it never existed....


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33766-2004Dec3.html?sub=AR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Prediction:
Its only a matter of time till we start having funerals for embryos. The neos won't approve of either of these options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sin Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Man if they do
The embryo coffin business is a wide open area I'm sure a few well placed adds near fundie Churches would suck in tons of cash. lol

+ an off shoot of that is they might as well start trying woman for attempted murder every time they menstruate with out conception.
then again shouldn't be giving them ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Niendorff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. "killing embryos"

My, what an interesting choice of words Mr. Brown makes. Repeatedly.


MDN

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep: ombudsman@washpost.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sherilocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. The devil is in the details
<snip>

Agglomerations of cells such as this, known as teratomas, sometimes arise spontaneously as tumors from human egg or sperm cells. The teratomas contain partially or fully developed tissue, sometimes even teeth. But they are structurally disorganized and nonviable.

In Hurlbut's concept, the cells could be removed and then have their inactivated genes restored, making them functionally normal and presumably capable of developing into usable stem cells.

"If we could biologically mimic what goes on in teratomas, that would be what I'm after," he said.

Enthusiasm for the two ideas was not universal.

Paul R. McHugh, a psychiatrist from Johns Hopkins University, told Hurlbut: "What you propose, really, is to build a weird genetic hybrid. . . . Is that right?"

He added that he had not "finished my thoughts on this. But a few red flags come up."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Petrushka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. A third option . . .
"Baby teeth provide life-giving stem cells":

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/index.cfm?c_id=5&ObjectID=9001636
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frustrated_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Unbelievable.
The bumbling idiots are using semantics and chicanery to find a backdoor which allows the use of embryonic stem cells, but think of a way which makes it far more difficult for scientists to actually use the damned things. First we have to correct the cancer???? And then trust that genetic modification did not somehow corrupt the line?

Jesus christ on a popsicle stick. :( So continues the decline of American science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. "In the first, the embryo has already died"
Jesus will still have to kill puppies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Gardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. I didn't realize embryos had a heartbeat
Wouldn't it actually have to BE alive before you could kill it? These people are just plain cuckoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. It is far better to
throw the embryos harvested from women for fertility treatment out in the garbage than to 'kill them' for stem cell research. Where is my cluestick? Somebody needs a whackin'. Fergit the stick. Honey git me the cluegun, this is serious business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC