Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

World Trade Center Leaseholder Gets Boost From Federal Jury

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 07:14 PM
Original message
World Trade Center Leaseholder Gets Boost From Federal Jury
NEW YORK -- A federal jury decided Monday that the destruction of the World Trade Center was two events for insurance purposes, meaning leaseholder Larry Silverstein can collect twice from companies because separate planes hit two towers.

The verdict in U.S. District Court in Manhattan was the latest twist in Silverstein's efforts to turn his $3.5 billion insurance policy on the trade center complex into a $7 billion payout.

The jury was asked to rule specifically whether the terrorism could be considered one or two events for nine of the trade center's 24 insurance companies.
..........
In her closing argument, lawyer Carolyn H. Williams argued on behalf of the companies that the hijacked planes were like guided missiles and that the insurance payout should not depend on whether terrorists used "one or two or 10 or 100 weapons."

http://nytimes.com/2004/12/06/nyregion/06cnd-wtc.html?hp&ex=1102395600&en=2d2d11e618688baa&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gothmog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very interesting issue
Normally the intrepretation of a contract is a purely legal issue. Here this was treated as a fact issue and the jury found for the leasholder against the insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkie Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. read silverstein makes 3.7 billion dollars pure profit in 3 months!?!
It would be the tragedy of tragedies not to rebuild this part of New York," said Larry Silverstein, who closed on the $3.2 billion deal with his partner Westfield America Inc. in late July

http://www.realestatejournal.com/propertyreport/propertyreport/20010914-grant.html

who profits???
follow the money they say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I got what you are saying..
He did say they had to "pull it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkie Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. i'm not talking nr 7 here..
í'm talking knowledge before the fact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not taking sides.
Edited on Mon Dec-06-04 07:47 PM by HypnoToad
Insurance companies can be manipulative greedy scum, but I'm not too keen on greed from the other side either.

On the other hand, this chap is doing what any insurance company would do, given the opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lostnote03 Donating Member (850 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Odigo,Odigo!!!!
.....Put options,Put options!!!!Sharon cancelling his pep talk a few days before 9-11 in lower Manhattan!!!Airline security contracts!!!Geeesh, we certainly are living within the days of the Matrix!!!I guess its all good however since Attas passport was discovered within days at the 9-11 footprint.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. I read somewhere that it would cost somewhere in the vicinity of
20BB to dismantle the WTC and that they were approaching their end-of-life.....40 years? Is that $20 Billion dollar number real? If not, what would be the takedown cost? How would it be financed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC