Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Kerik's Surveillance Activity In Saudi Arabia Is Disputed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 10:53 PM
Original message
WP: Kerik's Surveillance Activity In Saudi Arabia Is Disputed
Cabinet Pick Is Accused of Carrying Out Hospital Chief's Agenda

The autobiography of Bernard B. Kerik, President Bush's nominee to head the Department of Homeland Security, recounts a difficult time 20 years ago when he was expelled from Saudi Arabia amid a power struggle involving the head of a hospital complex where Kerik helped command a security staff.

In the book, Kerik described his discomfort at having to investigate employees' private lives, but said it was necessary because of the Saudis' laws prohibiting drinking and mingling of the sexes in public. "It was challenging, negotiating such a closed, rigid system and trying to find justice in laws that, to an American, were unjust," he wrote. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in 1984, the book said, after he had a physical altercation with a Saudi secret police official who was interrogating him.

Since he was nominated last week to be homeland security secretary, however, nine former employees of the hospital have said that Kerik and his colleagues were carrying out the private agenda of the hospital's administrator, Nizar Feteih, and that the surveillance was intended to control people's private affairs. Feteih became embroiled in a scandal that centered in part on his use of the institution's security staff to track the private lives of several women with whom he was romantically involved, and men who came in contact with them, the ex-employees said.

Kerik, who as chief of investigations was considered third in command of the security staff, personally surveilled some employees and at times confronted them with the results, several former employees said. He also was a lead investigator in the controversial arrest, for drinking, of a physician who was detained and deported from Saudi Arabia for the crime.

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45175-2004Dec7.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick'em when their up...
kick'em when their down...


We love dirty laundry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. No doubt...
Kerik has made some non-friends during his meteoric rise. Undoubtedly, it comes with the job of being a no-neck enforcer.

Perhaps some of these people will come forward and talk now, in their outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is it possible that the thug might not get approved?
I am convinced that we haven't heard the tip of the iceberg about Bernard Kerik.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. holy crap
kicking it old school
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Mighty coincidental...
Bush's DHS choice has security experience with the Saudis. I knew he'd failed in Iraq recently, but I wasn't aware of this specialized previous experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Shocking that Guiliani had so much influence with Chimp that this thug was
even considered. Have you read the New York Newsday reports about Kerik...ugh..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Man, this guy is just a lighting rod!
Scandals just keep popping up with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Lightning rod? Oh, you mean bush, right? Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. investigating the private lives in order to enforce sex laws??
well, welcome to the U.S. Homeland security department...in fact, take the reins and go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. The upper class has often found its Capos and enforcers from the lower
And Kerik, with a Dickensian childhood, just fits the bill to a t. Every step of his life brings forth ethical and legal questions as he curried favor with the powerful and acted as their muscle man. For Junior, who wants nothing but yes-men, he's a perfect addition. Couple it with the "tough-guy, man-of-the-people" crap, and it's a PR hoedown.

Proles who've been lifted from the underclass are the perfect functionaries: they'll do ANYTHING for the aristocrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC