Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Recount ahead for pot measure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sled Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 02:47 PM
Original message
Recount ahead for pot measure
Recount ahead for pot measure

http://www.oaklandtribune.com/Stories/0,1413,82~1726~2589148,00.html

Supporters of failed Berkeley initiative say vote deficit too close

By Kristin Bender, STAFF WRITER

Friday, December 10, 2004 - 6:17:51 AM PST

BERKELEY -- Leaders of a failed November ballot measure that would
have given medical marijuana patients potentially unlimited access to
the drug have asked the Alameda County Registrar of Voters for a
ballot recount.

Measure R would have replaced Berkeley's 10-plant limit with a
patient's "personal needs," defined by a doctor and the patient. It
also would have relaxed zoning laws for dispensaries and set up a peer
review committee to oversee operations at the city's three
dispensaries.

The measure lost by 191 votes, according to official results from the
registrar. The results show 25,167 people voted against the measure,
while 24,976 Berkeley residents cast ballots in favor of the
initiative.

Proponents say the results are too close for comfort.

"We experienced several inconsistencies with the count process that
didn't make us feel very good," said recount spokeswoman Dege Coutee,
who ran the Yes on R campaign. "We see a recount as a way to check the
system and make sure it's working appropriately."

(snip)

CONTACT INFO: triblet@angnewspapers.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RawMaterials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. potheads want a recount
Edited on Fri Dec-10-04 02:50 PM by RawMaterials
"we lost track of what number we were at and now we have to start over"
:):)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Freeper!
Alert! Alert!

Just kidding. :) You might be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigobusiness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You might
Edited on Fri Dec-10-04 03:32 PM by indigobusiness
be onto something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. "Ohhh... isn't this ballot pretty? Loook at it. It's soooo clean!"
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Number Of Votes They Received Was Not High Enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC