Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GI Admits to Killing Hurt Iraqi Teenager

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 07:34 PM
Original message
GI Admits to Killing Hurt Iraqi Teenager
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=540&ncid=716&e=2&u=/ap/20041211/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq

BAGHDAD, Iraq - A U.S. soldier pleaded guilty Friday to killing a severely wounded Iraqi teenager in what investigators say may have been a mercy killing, the latest of several similar incidents that have undercut efforts by the United States to win support among Iraqis and defeat a rampant insurgency.


The conviction of Staff Sgt. Johnny M. Horne Jr., 30, of Winston-Salem, N.C., comes almost a month after the Nov. 13 killing of another wounded Iraqi found lying in a Fallujah mosque among the bodies of several people killed during a weeklong operation to retake that city from insurgents.


Horne is the first of four soldiers from Company C, 1st Battalion, 41st Infantry Regiment, based in Fort Riley, Kan., to face court-martial on charges of murdering Iraqis during fighting in Baghdad's impoverished Sadr City in August.


This week in Germany, a U.S. tank company commander was ordered court-martialed after being accused of shooting and killing a critically injured Iraqi driver for radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr on May 21 near Kufa, 100 miles south of Baghdad.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whoah! Watch out for the imposition of "mercy killing" on any human being
Did the teenager ASK to be killed? Otherwise, imposition of death CANNOT be classified as a "mercy killing",...at least with respect to human beings who are supposed to be graced with the freedom of CHOICE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What if he had not been old enough to ask? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thekoan Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. ...i think you're overreacting, eh?
The military tribunal heard witness testimony that troops fired on a group of Iraqi men placing homemade bombs along a road in Sadr City. Other soldiers arrived to find a burning truck and casualties around it.

Witnesses said the soldiers, including Horne, tried to rescue the teenager from inside the vehicle, but decided he was beyond help because of severe burns and abdominal wounds. A criminal investigator said the soldiers decided "the best course of action was to put (the victim) out of his misery."

...so let's think about it... the kid's got severe burns and abdominal wounds... what could that mean possibly? could it mean that he had widespread third degree burns? could it mean he'd been disemboweled?

...i'm not saying it's so... but i am saying you're jumping the gun in your condemnation... if in fact he was wounded in something similar to the way i described (and i think he was. why else would they have mentioned the "abdominal wounds"?), then wouldn't you think a "mercy killing" necessary?

...or would you have him just let the kid lie there in his own blood, with the smell of his own burnt flesh and innards scenting his final moments?

...furthermore, witnesses said he tried to help the kid out of the truck, eh? why rescue him only to pop him shortly afterward?

...so you're covered in burns. all you know is pain. and there's a funny, wet feeling all over your stomach (well, what you can _feel_ of your stomach). there's a terrible smell and you know it's burnt flesh and you know it's yours. you wanna endure that pain even longer?

...we are against this war, but we must not be rabid. we must not jump the gun. to do so is to give the other side further ammunition with which to demonize us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. and just who annointed you God? ...... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thekoan Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. ...i'm assuming...
...that you had some lovely response to my comments that just happened to get cut out by the evil "internets"...

...if, however, that is not the case... no one appointed me god... i'm just trying to look at this situation in a manner that doesn't immediately accuse bush of being the great-granddaddy of all evils...

...that said, i am against this war. i think bush is a terrible president and a worse person. despite all that, though, i'd hate to be a severely burned, possibly disemboweled person lying on a roadside... in all likelihood, i'd ask the nearest passerby to kill me... and, if i couldn't manage to speak, i'd hope they had the wherewithall to realize that i couldn't possibly want to continue living in that condition...

...that's not to say i can read the kid's mind... i'm just postulating...

-kev
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. Mercy killing by a soldier with no medical background is playing god. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Over-reacting? This president's brother blocks "mercy killing",...
Edited on Fri Dec-10-04 09:52 PM by Just Me
,...of a woman who had expressed her wishes to her husband to vanquish "life support" if she had no capacity to self-function. It's okay for him to demand life when she and her husband have suffered for like ever.

Who the fuck is anyone to decide the life or death of anyone?

Allowing this woman's wishes would be humane. Yet, somehow, the "mercy killing" (or death sentence, whatever one may perceive it) is A-O-K if a member of an occupying force determines this particular is or is not worth continued existence.

It just goes to show how callous human beings, especially those who believe their value/judgment somehow surpasses all other human value/judgment,...can be.

Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thekoan Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. ...you're dealing with...
...too many degrees of separation... there is the soldier... then there is bush... then there is............ bush's brother???

...yes, i agree that the woman in florida deserves to die with dignity... (if it is the case that she is incapacitated beyond a shadow of a doubt)... but, no matter how much we like to pick on the bush family and lump them together, that has _nothing_ to do with this case...

...let's assume the iraqi teen was laying on the ground in the position i postulated earlier (that is: 3rd degree burns over a large portion of his body. partially or totally eviscerated (remember: abdominal wounds))...

...are you telling me it _wouldn't_ be humane to kill him? he's not going to live. why make him suffer that much longer?

...don't get me wrong... if the soldier just popped him in a manner similar to the shooting of the soldier in fallujah, then that's wrong and should be prosecuted... but if the kid was wounded like i think he was wounded, then it WAS a mercy killing, because what human being would want to see another human suffer in that state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Uh
you still are NOT to shoot and kill injured people in war.

That little quaint Geneva Convention and all. Silly stuff that, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thekoan Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. yeah, i know... but it's tough, you know?
...on the one side, you've got the geneva conventions, a grand achievement indeed. a testament to the common humanity of all us... well... humans...

...but on the other side...

...you've got a kid... prime of his life... delirious from the incredible pain... doesn't speak your language... but he's screaming all the same... you know he's going to die... and you can let him suffer out the rest of his life... or you can spare him some amount of pain...

...i'm sorry... i hate bush... i hate the war... i despise conservatives... i loathe jingoism and the deification of the military... but i still think that (if the kid was injured in the way i imagine him being injured) this was the right thing to do.

-kev
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Oh, yeah,...check out the pictures of our soldiers, burnt flesh and all,..
,...being kept alive,...whether they want to live or not.

Don't patronize me with all that "giving ammunition to the other side" bullshit.

BE REAL. BE TRUE. "Hard metal jacket" (that the "dreamers" wanted to pretend was not real). This is life. This is humanity. If you are an enemy to humanity,...to freedom and democracy,...you will continue to imply that I am somehow "the bad guy".

Pro-life, spreading democracy and freedom,...my ass!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thekoan Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. "BE REAL. BE TRUE."
Edited on Sat Dec-11-04 02:27 AM by thekoan


...in any case... i do not mean to patronize... this is a genuine concern... i cringe for the left whenever one of our own overreacts to something or another... the whole "was bush wired during debates" scandal was a weeks-long cringefest for me... so i cringe to see people jumping on this in the manner they do...

...bottom line, we don't know the full story... i won't pretend to know it... but i do have ideas as to how this could be seen as a mercy killing (given the (barebones) description we get from news reports...

>>This is life. This is humanity. If you are an enemy to humanity,...to
>> freedom and democracy,...you will continue to imply that I am somehow
..."the bad guy".

...for one: i hope you are aware of how remarkably similar that statement is in sentiment to "you're either for us or against us". but that's neither here nor thre...

...we _should_ be concerned with not giving our enemies political ammo... that's "politics"... learn to play it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. What makes Iraqis "our" (your) enemy?
Edited on Sat Dec-11-04 03:12 AM by NNN0LHI
Have Iraqis attacked you or your country? Did they ever even have plans to do so? So really, why are the Iraqis your enemy? Is it that they will not capitulate to a foreign army's demands while in their own country? (Would you if the situation were reversed?) They can't leave. They are at home. The US war machine, on the other hand being the aggressor in this situation can leave any time they want to. I am not_being_facetious here. I truly want to know. What makes the Iraqis_your_enemy? And so you know in advance, the Iraqis are NOT my enemy.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thekoan Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. actually...
...i don't believe i ever said the iraqis _were_ my enemy... i think you're jumping a li'l too hard on this one, hoss... trynna get ammo where there is none... i could be wrong, but i believe i said in my original post that "we're against this war"... thus, what then is the likelihood that someone who'd say that would still consider the iraqis the enemy? c'mon... realistically...

...in any case... no... i don't think the iraqis are our enemies. i meant our political enemies on the other side of the ideological spectrum. again, don't get me wrong: i'm no bush/military/war apologist... i just believe we must be cautious in how we react to things because they use any misjudged overreaction on our part to further portray us as loonies... and it _works_ in the circles they preach to...

...having said all that... i must reiterate that i don't know the specifics of the case. i don't know how wounded the kid was. i don't know the soldier's mindstate. but if the kid was severely wounded and in extreme anguish and there was nothing anyone could do save let him lie there cooking and screaming... well, hell, i'd think a mercy killing was the most humane thing to do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. I don't think you understand
"mercy killings" have no place in military law or any code of conduct.

They just don't. You are NOT to shoot an unarmed, injured person. Period. The laws do not make concessions for "mercy killings."

The Geneva Convention and the UCMJ are not laws to be carried out only in ideal conditions, they are laws to be carried out at ALL times.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thekoan Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. ...i understand...
...and i'd still condone a mercy killing if the kid was injured in the manner i described before...

...i'm aware that there's no concession for mercy killing in the geneva conventions... that's why you've never heard me arguing the legality of this event... i know it was illegal... my original contention was with your reaction...

...my question then is this: what would you have done? you have a kid lying there burnt to a crisp and all he's doing is screaming and you know he isn't going to live... but for now he's not showing any signs of dying soon and you know the rest of his life is going to be agony...

...so what would you have done? remember there's nothing you can do to help the kid. so what do you do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. I follow the UCMJ and the Geneva Convention.
Edited on Sat Dec-11-04 12:39 PM by Bouncy Ball
I don't shoot him. If the action allows me, I try to help him as much as I can. There are plenty of stories of troops easing the pain and the dying of a wounded civilian in their last moments. But they are not allowed to shoot them.

The point of those laws are that they didn't want soldiers dispensing "justice" in the field. There's a good reason for that, as that is a big, wide, nasty door to open.

That's evidenced by the fact that he was found guilty of violating said laws.

Imagine if you only had to say "well he was injured and I determined he was mortally injured, so I just took him out of his misery."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Would you feel the same way
if it was a US soldier? My guess is that there would be universal outrage if a badly wounded US soldier had his brains blown out in order to "put him out of his misery".

Maybe not from you though.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thekoan Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. ...
...the difference being that our soldiers are likely receiving much better care than do these wounded iraqis... i can't say for certain.. and if i'm wrong, please correct... but it seems likely...

...that said: no, it wouldn't make a difference to me if it were one of our soldiers... if someone _genuinely_ puts another person out of their excruciating (inevitably life-ending) agony, then that action is excusable and humane and i dare you to say otherwise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Again,
it has no place in military law or code of conduct and THAT is what this soldier is being tried under.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
29. Actually, we are supposed to administer medical care
to wounded Iraqis.

And if it wouldn't make a difference to you if one of our wounded soldiers was shot like a dog to "put him out of his misery", well, wouldn't that kind of "make the left look bad"? I thought that we weren't supposed to take any position that might have that effect. I wish you would get your story straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. What do you mean WE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thekoan Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. by "we" i mean...
...we left-leaning/leftist/ultraleft denizens/frequenters of this site... i hit the du boards on the daily to see what's up in the world and am rarely disappointed...

...simply put... by "we" i mean all of us... i hope none of you are thinking i'm just some freeper lurker or something... i am a leftist and i believe it would be within the interest of the left to _not_ overreact to this supposed mercy killing until more facts are known about the event.

...don't get me wrong... if it turns out the soldier shot the guy in cold blood, i'll be among the first to condemn him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. I think you mean 'mercy murder'
After all, he was just charged and convicted with murder by his peers.

Will you condemn him now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. thekoan look down here.
Here are the Geneva Conventions that apply to this case:

"Incurably wounded and sick prisoners of war whose mental or physical fitness seems to have been gravely diminished must be repatriated directly to their home countries. (Convention III, Art. 110)"

"The wounded and sick are to be collected and cared for by the party that has them in its power. (Convention I, Art. 3, Sec. 2)"

"The wounded cannot renounce their Geneva Convention protections. (Convention I, Art. 7)"


"In the case of an internal conflict, combatants must show humane treatment to civilians and enemies who have been wounded or who have surrendered. Murder, hostage-taking and extrajudicial executions are all forbidden. (Convention I, Art. 3)"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. You beat me to it.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Nope, can't support the Geneva Convention.
Might make the left look bad, like we're all a bunch of extremists or over-reacting or somthin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. ....
off sarcasm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. It was intended as sarcasm,
if that's what your asking. Sorry if I didn't make that clear.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. SUPPORT THE TROOPS
Kill a few Rag-Heads for Halliburton---

Get a medal.

Become a Cop when you come back.

Kill a few Liberal protesters at an anti-War demonstration. !!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
40. Ah! The great circle of life! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. My Lai?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingChicken Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. Don't see the troops killing their own severly wounded casualties
But of course because it's Iraqi scum it's ok, just put him out of his misery like old yeller.

Please remind the troops that Iraqi's are not dogs, they are rather Human Beings, with families much like our own.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NCN007 Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. the do it with morphine n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Yep
what he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Bush Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm as against this "war" as anyone ...
Because this "war" has nothing to do with national security and because things like this happen in war. War is hell afterall.

But we can't sit here and pick apart incedents like this after we brainwash these kids, pump them full of drugs, and send them into some of the most hostile conditions imaginable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
21. Mercy killing is ok as long as it is in countries the U.S. has invaded
And as long as the recipients of mercy had previously been the recipients of U.S. bombs or bullets. Mercy killing for terminal cancer patients, on the other hand, is against God's law. It is all very simple really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. ..as long as it is in countries the U.S. has invaded..and has lots of oil
Details are important.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. It's true, that always smooths the way. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renaissanceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
33. We should shoot him.
See how he likes it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC