New Kelly claim splits medical opinion

[CHIMO]

Two of Britain's foremost forensic pathologists have dismissed the claim by paramedics that the weapons expert David Kelly may not have died by cutting his wrists.

Professor Guy Rutty, of Leicester University, said: "The blood could have gone straight into the ground."

"When you put this evidence together with other pieces, including the fact that Dr Kelly's body appears to have been moved from slumped against a tree to flat on its back - and we know photographs are in existence to prove this - then it illustrates the need for a full inquest where all this can be properly investigated."

At the Hutton inquiry Ms Hunt said she had not seen the wound on Kelly's wrist, nor had she examined the ground for blood or blood loss.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/hutton/story/0,13822,1372404,00.html

[truthisfreedom]

1. gee, and they have waited HOW long to come to this conclusion?

it's beyond laughable how predictable this stuff is. they wait too long to recount votes, they wait until the evidence trail has gone dead before questioning the obvious...

[GeorgeGist]

2. So they didn't bother to do a full investigation did they?

And now its probably too late. Convenient, no? Or just more incompetence?

[imenja]

3. I suspected that guy was murdered

It all seemed too convenient for Blair. Who knows. Worse things have happened.

[struggle4progress]

4. kick

:kick: