Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Colombia Troops Being Sought for Iraq (mercenaries)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:32 AM
Original message
AP: Colombia Troops Being Sought for Iraq (mercenaries)
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20041217/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/colombia_contracting_for_iraq


<snip>
Colombia is a member of President Bush (news - web sites)'s "coalition of the willing" in Iraq, although it hasn't sent any troops. Its troops instead are battling a 40-year-old Marxist insurgency with U.S. aid on its own turf.


But now, instead of Colombian troops on the ground in Iraq, former Colombian soldiers are going as contractors — and earning up to $8,000 monthly.


Efforts have been made in several Latin American countries to recruit contractors for Iraq, but Colombia's conflict, pitting leftist rebels against right-wing paramilitaries, presents special complications.


The recruitment drive here comes as the outlawed paramilitary groups are demobilizing. Suddenly the fighters — many of them former Colombian army soldiers — are finding themselves out of work after waging a dirty war of massacres and assassinations against rebels and their suspected collaborators.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. great, now we're recruiting terrorists
The right-wing paramilitaries, the AUC, are included among the list of terrorist organizations. Now we're recruiting them to fight in Iraq. That makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SweetLeftFoot Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Makes sense
The US is allied with smack dealing warlords in Afghanistan, so why not coke dealing Colombians?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. They ain't fighting a war...
They are making an International Speedball Overdose. Yip. Pee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SweetLeftFoot Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. They travel to conflicts aboard ...
the USS John Belushi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Outlawed paramilitary groups?
"The recruitment drive here comes as the outlawed paramilitary groups are demobilizing. Suddenly the fighters — many of them former Colombian army soldiers — are finding themselves out of work after waging a dirty war of massacres and assassinations against rebels and their suspected collaborators."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. lovely, isn't it???
there it is in B&W that the USA is hiring murderers and God only knows what else, and not a whimper from our members in congress??

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Isn't there a law against this?
If not, shouldn't there be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. even if there was a law....
you know the US would ignore it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. How true.
Silly me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. How long are the people of this country going to let this kind
piracy go on. The democrats are awfully quiet these days!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Iraqis seem to handle mercenaries pretty well
Someone had better get the barbie warmed up.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Someone did !
Edited on Sat Dec-18-04 07:52 AM by leftchick


ATTENTION EDITORS - VISUALS COVERAGE SCENES OF DEATH AND INJURY Onlookers view the body of a local driver laying next to his burning vehicle, one of four men killed after they were attacked by gunmen in the northern Iraq (news - web sites) city of Mosul, December 17, 2004. Three of the four men were said to be westerners by witnesses on the scene, One of the western men was beheaded near the scene of the attack. REUTERS/Namir Noor-Eldeen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unforgiven Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. And
it will probably serve us right, when these "hired hands" turn on us and join the insurgents after taking the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. bin Laden once worked as a CIA/USA paid mercenary. Think about it
Edited on Fri Dec-17-04 10:53 PM by NNN0LHI
Analysis: Forgotten Coverage of Afghan 'Freedom Fighters' (Osama)


http://www.afgha.com/?af=article&sid=13224

FAIR: Fairness and Accurace in Reporting
January/February 2002
By David N. Gibbs

The villains of today's news were heroes in the '80s

The current war in Afghanistan is increasingly presented as a war for the human rights of the Afghan people, to liberate them from their oppressive Taliban rulers. The Taliban’s severely regressive policies toward women have received particular attention, with even First Lady Laura Bush issuing condemnations of this repression. And the press has overwhelmingly followed suit, portraying the war as an ideological struggle against the evils of Islamic extremism.

But the U.S. government and the American press have not always opposed Afghan extremists. During the 1980s, the Mujahiddin guerrilla groups battling Soviet occupation had key features in common with the Taliban. In many ways, the Mujahiddin groups acted as an incubator for the later rise of the Taliban in the 1990s.

The senior members of the Taliban had Mujahiddin combat roles; Taliban leader Mohammed Omar fought with the Mujahiddin and lost an eye in combat. Many of the Taliban members who were too young to participate in that struggle grew up in Mujahiddin-controlled refugee camps in Pakistan. The religious schools from which many Taliban emerged were steeped in the zealous, politicized form of Islam that the Mujahiddin did so much to foster. Many of the Taliban’s ugliest features--notably their mistreatment of women--had clear precedents in the conduct of the Mujahiddin forces.

There has, in short, been a fairly dramatic and Orwellian shift in the tone of public discourse regarding Afghanistan. While Islamic extremism is now viewed with great hostility, in the 1980s U.S. policy strongly supported such extremism; there is scarcely any recognition that a little more than a decade ago, the U.S. press waxed eloquent about the Afghan "freedom fighters." snip

In short, there is nothing terribly new about the Taliban’s brutality, their ideological intolerance, their involvement in drug trafficking or their repressive attitudes toward women; all of these features were clearly present during the period of the Jihad against Communism. The Mujahiddin were allies of convenience for the United States, which was bent on winning the Cold War.

In an effort to augment the Mujahiddin forces, the U.S. encouraged the influx into Afghanistan of thousands of idealistic Muslims, eager to participate in the struggle, from countries throughout the Middle East. One of the first of these expatriate Arabs was Osama bin Laden, who was "recruited by the CIA" in 1979, according to Le Monde (9/15/01). Bin Laden operated along the Pakistani border, where he used his vast family connections to raise money for the Mujahiddin; in doing so, he "worked in close association with U.S. agents," according to Jane’s Intelligence Review (10/1/98).

Despite CIA denials of any direct Agency support for Bin Laden’s activities, a considerable body of circumstantial evidence suggests the contrary. During the 1980s, Bin Laden’s activities in Afghanistan closely paralleled those of the CIA. Bin Laden held accounts in the Bank for Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), the bank the CIA used to finance its own covert actions (London Daily Telegraph, 9/27/01). Bin Laden worked especially closely with Hekmatyar--the CIA’s favored Mujahiddin commander (The Economist, 9/15/01). In 1989, the U.S. shipped high-powered sniper rifles to a Mujahiddin faction that included bin Laden, according to a former bin Laden aide (AP, 10/16/01).

Former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger would later comment about the Afghans (The Economist, 4/25/98): "We knew they were not very nice people.... We had this terrible problem of making choices." The choice that Weinberger and his colleagues made was, of course, to back the Mujahiddin, along with their Arab supporters, in spite of their records and ideologies. Predictably enough, the press strongly endorsed this policy and proceeded to praise the Mujahiddin groups.
more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. "which US...companies are hiring...is unclear"
Blackwater? Halliburton seems like the one most likely to want to keep their name out of any bad press. They'd know this wouldn't sit well. -not that it would mean squat to them or the govt of the United States of Republicans.

snip>
Precisely which U.S. company or companies are hiring contractors in Colombia is unclear — and the desire for anonymity appears to be intentional.

"It's a really low-profile process, with a lot of confidentiality," the former officer said. "It's a sensitive thing ... to take military personnel out of a country like Colombia to work in another country."

A classified ad posted by "an American company" recently appeared in El Tiempo, Colombia's biggest newspaper, looking for people with military experience to work abroad. The unnamed company invited those who have had combat training and are no older than 37 to apply to a Bogota post office box.

The former army officer said he did not answer the newspaper ad but met with Colombian recruiters for an American company on two occasions after setting up an interview through former military colleagues. He would not identify the company. The pay ranges from $6,000 to $8,000 a month, he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
16. Believe me, it won't be long before they turn on us too.
If they go to fight in Iraq they deserve whatever the US does to them.
they aren't welcome here as immigrants but they may be as fodder for the war machine. Sick, sick, sick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Bush wanted payback for our money to Columbia--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. the contractors money is really the US taxpapers money!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC