Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Polls empty in Turkmenistan elections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 03:38 PM
Original message
Polls empty in Turkmenistan elections
Sunday, December 19, 2004 · Last updated 6:53 a.m. PT

Polls empty in Turkmenistan elections

By ALEXANDER VERSHININ
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

ASHGABAT, Turkmenistan -- Polling stations were nearly empty Sunday in elections for Turkmenistan's rubber-stamp parliament, forcing officials to carry ballot boxes door-to-door in this nation ruled by a former Soviet Communist boss who has been declared president-for-life.

The 131 candidates contesting Parliament's 50 seats all represent the Central Asian country's only party, the Democratic Party led by President Saparmurat Niyazov.


(snip)

The government refused to invite foreign observers for Sunday's elections. Authorities have said the polls' fairness will be ensured by 200 observers from the state-controlled National Institute of Democracy and Human Rights.

(snip)

Niyazov prefers to be called Turkmenbashi, or "Father of all Turkmens" and his image adorns buildings across the country. His golden statue in Ashgabat rotates to always face the sun.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apeurope_story.asp?category=1103&slug=Turkmenistan%20Election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. This dictator is delusional and dangerous...
I heard on the BBC that he renamed one of the months after his mother. This man is Stalin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nowhere near bad enough to be Stalin.
Too delusional to be Stalin. Or, rather, differently delusioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. If he were ruling in Moscow instead of Ashgabat, he would be Stalin
Otherwise, he is impotent outside his borders simply because of the size of his country and limited resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. I read that in a previous election Niyazov had an opponent
He didn't like it so banned the opposing party then held the election. He won with 96% of the vote.

Well that's one way to win without the help of diebold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wabbajack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Who got the other 4?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Perhaps that old standby
Hanging Chads

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yes, the eternal runner up. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. U.S. presidential election, circa 2012?
President-for-life, how long until that term becomes common?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Another ally of the U.S. Govt.?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes, there is a US Air Base there
so yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ausiedownunderground Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. Niyazov nowhere near as bad as Ismail Karimov in Uzebekistan
Niyazov is a lunatic but appears like a benevolent dictator when compared to President Ismail Karimov of Uzebekistan. If Americans were really serious about spreading freedom and democracy by invading offending countries then Uzebekistan would be top of the list. This guy makes Saddam Hussien look down right "democratic". He slaughters muslims like there was no tomorrow. His internal security forces are savage in their efforts to stamp out dissent in Uzebekistan. This is the guy who "dips" people in acid baths or feeds them into shredders. I know this because i have an internet lover who is Uzebek and unfortunately is still trapped in Tashkent and she believe it or not is Jewish!
Karimov is the smirking chimps best friend in Central Asia. America has a huge air base in the country and basically props up Karimov's regime against the will of most Uzebek's. Interestingly Osama Bin Ladens body guard brigade are all Uzebek's having replaced the Chechens. They have a fearsome warrior reputation. Uzebeki males are "hard core" and don't treat females with the type of respect that hopefully Western males do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Just saw this summary of the power struggle going on over there
Yet starting in 2000, Karimov's stream of advice stopped for a time, perhaps because matters took a turn for the worse in Uzbekistan itself. Suddenly, the government noticed that foreign debt had reached $5 billion, that standards of living were declining dramatically and that foreign direct investment had shrunk significantly. Finally, since 2001, the Uzbek government has been experiencing a severe budget crisis, as income from exports and taxes has fallen. Despite a good cotton harvest in 2004 and favorable world market conditions for cotton, Uzbekistan's main export commodity, the state is still struggling to make ends meet.

To combat the crisis, a state of economic and political emergency was declared. While Karimov scorned shock therapy as a way to transform the command economy into a market economy in the early '90s, by 2002 he was forced to implement it himself, although in altered form. To stabilize the national currency and eventually make it convertible, the state imposed draconian fiscal measures. A war began against private trade, which the government saw as the main source of the shrinking state budget and the eroding national currency.

"Reform" measures were far from civilized: Goods were confiscated from market stalls, pensions and salaries long went unpaid, and legal bank accounts were frozen. Naturally, business' response was to move into the informal sector or escape to neighboring countries where conditions were more conducive to private business. As a result, the tax base continued to shrink and tax revenues decline. Things became so bad that private banks were ordered by the government to sell vodka in order to increase the flow of cash into state coffers. Bankers had no choice but to turn to mafia bosses dealing in shady money.

Shock therapy in its Uzbek form, with its heavy emphasis on tough administrative repression, led to widespread public discontent. The explosions in Tashkent and Bukhara earlier this year and the massive public unrest in the markets of Kokand, Bukhara and other cities this November are the first signs that the system is crumbling. The Uzbek model, once so attractive to some of the country's neighbors and even to Russian presidents, is not looking nearly so promising today. Uzbekistan is seen as less and less stable socially and politically. If the authorities have managed to stay in power, it is due not to a social contract as it was until recently, when elites controlled exports while small businesses controlled the bazaars. Authorities are increasingly turning to force and fear to stay on top.

The recent sensational announcement by Karimov that the death penalty might be suspended in Uzbekistan should not lead anyone astray. This is merely another smoke screen meant to secure the goodwill of the world community as parliamentary elections approach on Dec. 24. These elections will be neither free nor fair. Karimov has made similar pacifying statements in the past regarding torture, but the proposed reforms never got beyond talk and official commissions. There is no other possibility: The regime, as never before, needs to keep the public afraid to keep it obedient. Thus, the regime must talk human rights while continuing brutal scare tactics.

Yet what in the end moved Karimov to start giving advice once again to his colleagues from the former socialist camp? This turn can be explained in part by his ambitious personality. Authoritarian rulers who have grown too accustomed to power and who have surrounded themselves with sycophants and yes men soon lose touch with reality and lose the ability to consider their own actions objectively.

This personality trait is coupled with another, very serious circumstance. Recently, Karimov has been emboldened by his notably expanded audience, an audience that pretends to listen to the Uzbek leader's bits of wisdom. This audience consists mainly of partners from the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, where Uzbekistan has been granted a place of honor completely incommensurate with its economic potential. Karimov is gaining more significance from the emerging conflict between Russia and China the on one hand and the United States on the other for influence in Uzbekistan.

The United States has suddenly found itself tied to its military base located in southern Uzbekistan. This base backs up and supplies the U.S. troops in Afghanistan. To all appearances, the United States has also linked the base to various long-term plans as part of a new strategic outlook. U.S. officials need the base as a way of stemming the swelling tide of Chinese and Russian military and economic might.

In this new Great Game being played in Central Asia, the geopolitical stakes in Uzbekistan are rising fast. The superpowers, fighting for control of Uzbekistan, are setting their pride aside and trying to make friends with Karimov. Russia has already pushed the problem of the Russian population in Uzbekistan into the background, much as it has in Turkmenistan. China is pretending not to notice the U.S. base in Khanabad. The United States needs to keep criticism of the repressive Uzbek regime's human rights record under wraps.

How long will Karimov succeed in playing the superpowers off each other? The answer to this question may hinge on the disturbing inconsistencies of Uzbekistan's increasing international clout compared to its stunted economic potential. This contradiction is laying the groundwork for increased instability.

The Uzbek regime, in its pursuit of rewards in return for its loyalty, will be forced to increase its pendulum-like swing between the various geopolitical centers. This in the end could well get on its patrons' nerves, as they want to see a more predictable and manageable leader in Uzbekistan. All parties will cultivate their own proteges in the elite, the military, the security agencies, the media and among the public at large. While this may seem highly unlikely today, tomorrow could bring a civil war of the kind that has turned many African conflicts into bloodbaths. Naturally, this would bode nothing but ill for the Uzbek people.

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2004/12/20/006.html

wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC