I wonder if she knows anything about Homeland Security money going to Marvin and Jeb Bush company "Winston Partners"?
http://www.counterpunch.org/burns1205.htmlProfits from the Patriot Act:
Inevitably, many companies are aggressively marketing services to make
businesses "Patriot Act"-compliant: that is, they sell computer
systems to enable banks to argue successfully to Uncle Sam that
they're not laundering money for terrorists. One of the most
aggressive is Sybase Inc., which developed a "Sybase PATRIOT
compliance Solution" months ago. Sybase, which said it wanted foreign
banks as customers (it already had a deal with the People's Bank of
China), landed Sumitomo Mitsui Bank in time for the October 2002
compliance deadline.
This is where Winston Partners comes in. The Chatterjee Group,
including Winston Partners, owns 5.5 million shares in Sybase
(Chatterjee businesses also have been paid thousands more shares in
Sybase). SEC filings show that Winston Partners LP owns 1,036,075
shares in Sybase; Winston Partners LDC holds 1,317,825 shares; and
Winston Partners LLC owns 1,221,837 shares. The shares owned by the
subsidiaries are collectively managed in funds for Winston Partners by
Pernendu Chatterjee. There is also a Chatterjee Charitable Foundation.
Business for Sybase is business for Bush, and the Patriot Act boosted
business.
Not that the Patriot Act is Sybase's only federal conduit. The company
is also a significant government contractor (especially nowadays),
with contracts from the Agriculture Department, the Navy ($2.9 million
in 2001), the Army ($1.8 million in 2001), the Defense Department
($5.3 million in 2001), Commerce, Treasury and the General Services
Administration among others. The federal procurement database lists
Sybase's total awards for 2001 as $14,754,000.
Sybase is only one of the companies with federal contracts from which
Marvin Bush's firm derives financial benefit. Winston Partners'
portfolio also includes Amsec Corp., which got Navy contracts worth
$37,722,000 in 2001.
The potential for abuse here can hardly be overstated. A branch of the
military or other government agency that risked funding cutbacks, for
example, could throw up a buffer by awarding a contract benefiting the
First Family. Why spend money on a lobbyist in the industry, when you
might have one in the White House?
Now let's step back and look at the big picture. The president's
brother is marketing to offshore customers (shipping out American
jobs, be it noted). He is closely linked to entities marketing
"outsourcing" and "global alternative investments" yet more
aggressively. Companies associated with them are doing other high-end
versions of the same. And some companies in which they have a stake
are involved in the most sensitive technology outside nuclear weapons
- being marketed simultaneously to the U.S. government, to foreign
banks and to the states (Colorado, Texas, Oklahoma, New Jersey and New
York also purchase from Sybase). This is "security"?
Nor is Marvin Bush the only family member in this picture. His brother
Jeb Bush, Florida's governor, is also an investor in the Winston
Capital Fund, managed by Marvin Bush's firm. And Indigo Systems Corp.,
another federal contractor ($2,629,000 in 2001 from Defense and NASA),
is substantially backed by The Carlyle Group, the global finance
company. Who's that? Why the President's father, George H.W. Bush, sits on their board.
Here is more on the Bush brothers links to security firms and 9/11:
Check DU discussion on Marvin's WTC security job:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/cgi-bin/duforum/duboard.cgi?az=show_thread&om=34990&forum=DCForumID60and another DU discussion on 03/03/03: Check the replies here out for links to United Airlines security as well, one of the airlines used in the attack!!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/cgi-bin/duforum/duboard.cgi?az=show_thread&om=822&forum=DCForumID66brother Marvin Bush: his connection to 9/11
"Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport."
Secrecy Surrounds 9/11 Investigation
-By Craig Cox-, Utne.com
February 2003 Issue
A member of the commission investigating the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington said he will push for “a wide-ranging, aggressive” probe that includes interviews with a less-than-cooperative White House. But how forthcoming will the Bush administration be when the president’s own brother’s name comes up in conversation.
The panelist, retired Democratic Congressman Tim Roemer, told Time.com that the investigation must go beyond the House-Senate inquiry that was chiefly notable for its inability to interview top-level members of the Bush administration. Officials such as Donald Rumsfelt, John Ashcroft, Colin Powell, and Condoleezza Rice “were not questioned directly about issues related to the Setpember 11 attacks,” an oversight Roemer said needs to be corrected.
But getting White House cooperation will not be easy, said Senator John McCain (R-Arizona), who sponsored legislation creating the commission. The Bush administration, he said, “slow-walked and stonewalled” the congressional inquiry. “I don’t see how you can have a thorough investigation without talking to the people who were in charge throughout the time period prior to 9/11,” he said.
Such an investigation could reveal some embarrassing Bush family connections with a company “that intersected the weapons and targets on a day of national tragedy.” As Margie Burns reports in The American Reporter, an electronic daily newspaper, Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company, Burns noted, was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Burns also served.
More: