Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Spitzer Says He Won't Drop Any Inquiries Begun by State

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 08:46 AM
Original message
Spitzer Says He Won't Drop Any Inquiries Begun by State
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/26/nyregion/26spitzer.html

<snip>
Attorney General Eliot Spitzer of New York said yesterday that he did not intend to cede to the federal government any of his existing or previous investigations into business practices.

Criticizing a front-page article in The New York Times yesterday about his plans, Mr. Spitzer issued a statement saying that increased regulatory activity by the federal government, particularly the Securities and Exchange Commission, made it more likely that Washington would take the lead or act alone in new investigations. But he said that his office would not withdraw from cases in which it is now actively involved, calling the notion "absurd."


The article referred imprecisely to Mr. Spitzer's plans, saying he was "ready to cede those investigations" to the federal government and leaving the incorrect impression that he was referring to existing investigations. The headline also said that he would "yield inquiries" to federal regulators.

The article "suggests that the attorney general has somehow altered his views on the role of his office in confronting corporate fraud," the statement said. "This is simply not true."

Mr. Spitzer, who recently announced his candidacy for governor of New York in the 2006 race, has become prominent in part because of his popular investigations into the securities and insurance industries. Industry officials have long criticized him for being overly aggressive in those areas, but Mr. Spitzer said yesterday he reserved the right to remain aggressive in protecting the interest of consumers. Without being specific, he promised several announcements early next year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good because the feds will make sure no one will be any penalty at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think the NYT needs to clean house again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. duplicate topic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC