Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army medics receive intense training

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 06:11 PM
Original message
Army medics receive intense training
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4705661,00.html

FORT CAMPBELL, Ky. (AP) - As the insurgents in Iraq step up their attacks, the Army has increased the intensity of its training of battlefield medics. That has meant moving the training from classrooms to more realistic settings and teaching medics to keep fighting the enemy - even if it means sometimes delaying treatment of the wounded.

``One medic on his weapon returning fire can make the difference between the enemy staying and continuing to fire on us, or saying `Whoa, I got to go,''' said Capt. Brad Tibbetts, the officer in charge of the Alfred V. Rascon School of Combat Medicine at Fort Campbell. ``That's one thing we teach them - when to delay and when you can't.''

This year, about 500 medics and others who work in small, isolated units will undergo training at the school. They attend the class partly to refresh skills they acquired during a 16-week course at Fort Sam Houston in Texas, where all new Army medics take civilian emergency medical technician classes and study battlefield techniques.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. well, it is certainly good for our soldiers
but when we bomb the hospitals where the Iraqi innocents are to go to have their legs cut off to save their lives, or the faces of babies and children repaired, and when there is no where for them to go because we bombed out the hospitals, I wonder what to think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-05 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. If medics weren't high value targets already,
they are now. Does this change their mission? Was it always like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why bother to have medics?
Edited on Sun Jan-02-05 06:35 AM by cornermouse
It seems to me that if they're supposed to keep fighting even if it "sometimes" delays treatment of the wounded, it is not unreasonable to assume that a percentage of our kids, whose lives could have been saved with treatment, are going to die. It would appear that there is no reason to have medics because clearly they're going to be fighting rather than saving lives on the battlefield.

Is this a Rumsfeld idea?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC