Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Research into prayer, fertility link now doubted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 12:32 PM
Original message
Research into prayer, fertility link now doubted
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/living/health/10553703.htm

By Julie Sevrens Lyons
Mercury News

Skeptics have called it the ``Miracle Study'' -- findings by scientists that simple prayers could dramatically boost fertility in women.

Published in a respected medical journal by a Capitola researcher, a department head at Columbia University and a Korean scientist also based at Columbia, it immediately attracted the attention of the news media, religious groups and couples desperately trying to conceive.

... But now, three years after the study first suggested that a higher power could influence pregnancy rates, critics are calling it all a sham, a black eye to the research community and proof that medical studies aren't always what they appear to be.

Many in the medical field are saying that the only miracle about the study is that it was published to begin with. They wonder if the research was ever conducted at all.

As the controversy rages, the Bay Area researcher is en route to a California prison camp on an unrelated fraud conviction. The second scientist recently took his name off the study. The third quietly left Columbia. The government conducted its own investigation and determined the study violated federal research guidelines.

more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. these "scientists" had to be wingnut plants...
no? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeBushytail Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. In related news...
throwing quarters in a wishing well found equally ineffective.

Scientists are now testing the "wishing on a star" theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. In my years of experience, I've found the most effective way to get a
woman pregnant is to have sex with her. While it doesn't work on every occasion (thankfully), the odds of conceiving are better when sex is involved.

I still wouldn't rule out prayer as a means to having sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Candidate for this month's "You Call This NEWS?" award
:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. ROFL!
"The third man is Capitola researcher Daniel P. Wirth. Federal court papers say he is a Santa Clara University law school graduate who is also known as John Wayne Truelove, Rudy Wirth and Rudolph Wirth. He was sentenced in November to five years in prison for embezzling more than $2 million from communications giant Adelphia. Now he is en route to a federal prison camp in Atwater, where he will be known as inmate No. 99442-111."

OK, we have two disgraced OB docs and a sleazeball lawyer who was caught with his hand in the till.

Yep, that's the standard for faith based research, all right. Just publish your conclusions, no nasty data collection needed, no messy numbers to crunch, it's all on faith.

This is what happens to science when you force gods into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. God chose for you to be barren. In vitro is wrong for born agains
If science is 'bad' and religion is 'good' in this new world order of radical religion, shouldn't the true believers accept that it was God's plan that they be infertile? They shouldn't turn to the evil scientists to intervene in this Divine plan. In vitro and fertility treatments allow man to intervene into the creation of life...clearly God's domain and part of the mysteries of "intelligent design". Right?!?!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I Suspect
If given the choice between looking at it as interfering with as god's plan, vs looking at it as interfering with Darwin, it'd be far easier to give Darwin the heave ho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Take 'their words' to the logical extreme
Since funadamentalists believe that God's plan is perfect, they must not support fertility intervention by the hands of man. They should accept GRACIOUSLY their infertility and praise the Lord for his divine plan. Right? In fact, the fundamentalists should unburden the US healthcare system completely by just praying about any illnesses. If God can actually be bothered to put W in the White House, surely he could take the time to cure their cancer. Doctors are all just evil scientists anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Nope
God would have led man to invent fertility treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Then abortion is a safe medical procedure too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. BWAH! "Trumpeted the New York TIMES..."
"Women who were prayed for became pregnant twice as often as those who did not have people praying for them," trumpeted the New York Times in 2001.

Um...would that be the same NY TIMES which just laughed at DU because a few posters indulged in Woo-Woo theories about the Asian tsunami?

So it's Tin-Foil-Hattery to wonder about the tsunami. But the TIMES reports it as undisputed fact when a few biased researchers announce that an Invisible Man In The Sky is fooling around with ovaries?

Priceless.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Link To NYT?
I would like to read exactly what they said about us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Check the board. At least 2 threads...
...are going strong on the subject, right here in LBN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Maybe they count the screaming "Oh God I'm Coming" as prayer. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. It took 3 years to call it a sham? 3 years? 3?
damn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. They were researching...
...if it counted as prayer when the subject screamed "OH GOD!" at just the right time...:evilgrin:

This study must have puzzled people, though. Especially those who bore children only to watch them come down with incurable diseases, which were not conquered by prayer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Oh sorry I said the same thing. It just popped into my head before
I read what you posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. No need to apologize...
Two slams are better than one! ;-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Wonder what the control group did? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. The control group also used Divine Intervention...
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 01:51 PM by onager
WARNING: This link is not work-safe or kid-safe. It will be VERY offensive to the religious:

http://www.divine-interventions.com/index2.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. ROFLMAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Reminds me of the Creation Science Fair

1st Place: "Using Prayer To Microevolve Latent Antibiotic Resistance In Bacteria"

Eileen Hyde and Lynda Morgan (grades 10 & 11) did a project showing how the power of prayer can unlock the latent genes in bacteria, allowing them to microevolve antibiotic resistance. Escherichia coli bacteria cultured in agar filled petri dishes were subjected to the antibiotics tetracycline and chlorotetracycline. The bacteria cultures were divided into two groups, one group (A) received prayer while the other (B) didn't. The prayer was as follows: "Dear Lord, please allow the bacteria in Group A to unlock the antibiotic-resistant genes that You saw fit to give them at the time of Creation. Amen." The process was repeated for five generations, with the prayer being given at the start of each generation. In the end, Group A was significantly more resistant than Group B to both antibiotics.

2nd Place: "Women Were Designed For Homemaking"
Jonathan Goode (grade 7) applied findings from many fields of science to support his conclusion that God designed women for homemaking: physics shows that women have a lower center of gravity than men, making them more suited to carrying groceries and laundry baskets; biology shows that women were designed to carry un-born babies in their wombs and to feed born babies milk, making them the natural choice for child rearing; social sciences show that the wages for women workers are lower than for normal workers, meaning that they are unable to work as well and thus earn equal pay; and exegetics shows that God created Eve as a companion for Adam, not as a co-worker.

http://objective.jesussave.us/creationsciencefair.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I love that website
For a long time I wasn't sure if it was satire or real because the satire is so.....subtle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. You've got to wonder when they use a line like this:
Take for example Apple Computers, makers of the popular Macintosh line of computers. The real operating system hiding under the newest version of the Macintosh operating system (MacOS X) is called... Darwin! That's right, new Macs are based on Darwinism!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Is that site the Onion.com of religious sites?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. When the guy gets out of jail, I'll bet he gets a job on
the 700 Club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. And while in jail, he can work for...
...Chuck Colson's Prison Ministries!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC