Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

London firm 'among top 10 war profiteers'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 11:42 PM
Original message
London firm 'among top 10 war profiteers'
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=597719

London firm 'among top 10 war profiteers'
By Andrew Buncombe in Washington
05 January 2005


A private security firm headed by a former British Army colonel, Tim Spicer, has been named as one of the "top 10 war profiteers" of 2004.

The London-based Aegis Defence Services was awarded a $293m (£155m) contract by the Pentagon in June last year to co-ordinate security operations among thousands of private companies, making it the biggest private security operation in Iraq.

Only US companies such as Halliburton and Bechtel, which are involved in providing support services and reconstruction, and the defence manufacturer Lockheed Martin have received larger contracts.

"The Aegis contract stirred up considerable controversy," said Charlie Cray, the director of the Centre for Corporate Policy in Washington, which drew up the list. Critics have questioned the accountability of private military contractors and the screening process by which they are awarded the contracts.

more...

Wow nice to know our tax dollars is going to England !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Glad to see there's ONE non-American firm in there
Way to go UK! Damn shame if they were ALL intimate friends of Bush or Cheney. Makes it look like we're the only corrupt bastards out there. Good old Brits pull through for us again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Intimate friends of Blair, perhaps? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. OH look a PMC...
I think they were called mercenaries in another century, great brave new world B and B created here. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bin.dare Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. a little background on Tim Spicer
http://www.serve.com/pfc/pmcbride/041117ie.html

Pentagon circles the wagons around 'Spicer' deal
By Ray O'Hanlon, Irish Echo, November 17-23, 2004

The U.S. Department of Defense is standing behind its decision to award a major security contract in Iraq to a company run by a controversial former British army officer.

The decision apparently removes all impediments to a $293 million payday for Tim Spicer, commander of the Scots Guards at a time when the regiment became embroiled in a controversial killing in Belfast.

The Department of The Army has written to five U.S. senators stating that the decision to award the contract to Aegis Defense Services last May was a "well founded" one.

The army's endorsement of the contract follows a separate decision by the Government Accountability Office to deny an appeal by a rival U.S. company for the contract, one of the largest tendered by the U.S. government for private security work in Iraq.

It was that protest, brought by Texas-based Dyncorp, that put the Aegis contract on hold and resulted in an investigation and legal determination by the GAO, the congressional and federal government financial and legal watchdog formerly known as the General Accounting Office.

The GAO denied Dyncorp because it did not have "standing" in the matter.

This was due to the fact that another unnamed company was considered the closest alternative to Aegis in the bidding process.

"We have very strict rules. To raise a challenge you must have standing," said Dan Gordon, who heads the GAO's bid protest unit.

Gordon said that the GAO had "in no way, shape or form" belittled the problems expressed by individuals and groups with Aegis and its head man.

However, the GAO was required to decide on the issue within strict and more limited legal parameters, Gordon indicated

"We simply never reached those issues," he said in relation to questions raised against the head of Aegis, former British army Lt. Col. Tim Spicer, who commanded the Scots Guards regiment in Belfast when teenager Peter McBride was shot dead in September 1992.

McBride was shot in the back and his death remains one of the most controversial of the Troubles.

In addition to the Pentagon, President Bush has also been urged to cancel the Aegis contract because of the controversy swirling around Spicer, not just in relation to Northern Ireland but also due to later business ventures around the world involving so-called "private military companies," a term widely viewed as merely a sanitized way of describing mercenaries.

The Iraq contract allows Aegis to supply "security services, anti-terrorism support and analyses, movement escort services, and close personal protection services" in Iraq.

But it was the specific role of Tim Spicer in the deal that prompted the concern of members of Congress, including five U.S. senators.

The five -- Charles Schumer, Hillary Clinton, Edward Kennedy, Chris Dodd and John Kerry -- wrote Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld last August calling on him to investigate the granting of the contract to Aegis. In the letter, the senators pointed to Spicer's record in Northern Ireland and allegations of his involvement in illicit arms deals in Africa.

The letter to Rumsfeld stated that the U.S. government required that all contractors be "responsible bidders" with a "satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics"

The senators asked Rumsfeld to disclose whether the government adequately considered Spicer's human rights abuses, or his vigorous defense of them, as part of Aegis's record and past performance rating when awarding the contract.

"It would be unfortunate if, in our effort to set an example of open government and democratic principles abroad, we undermined those principles through awarding contracts to an individual with a history of supporting excessive use of force against a civilian population," Sen. Clinton said separately.

The response to the senators' letter came last week, not from Rumsfeld, but from Sandra Sieber, director of the U.S. Army Contracting Agency.

Sieber wrote that beyond the GAO's decision denying the Dyncorp protest, it was "significant" that the British Ministry of Defense was apprised of the decision to award the contract to Aegis and "did not object or advise" against the action.

Sieber noted that neither Aegis or Spicer are on the U.S. General Services Administration list of parties excluded from federal contracting. She said that the contracting officer responsible for selecting Aegis had not been aware of human rights allegations against Spicer and Aegis at the time the contract decision was made.

"However, our post-award review of the facts surrounding these matters did not establish that Mr. Spicer's advocacy on behalf of his former soldiers had any bearing on his or Aegis's record of integrity and business ethics," Sieber wrote.

Fr. Sean McManus of the Irish National Caucus described the army's response to the senators' letter as "outrageous."

McManus, who has waged a campaign to have the contract scuttled, said that the decision put President Bush in the position of actually defending terrorism.

The president, he said, was funding an ex-British army officer who in Northern Ireland had "terrorized the McBride family and continues to terrorize them."



http://www.geocities.com/collusion2000_1999/mcbride17.html

29 October 2004
IAR ignore calls to support Mc Bride campaign
—from Pat Finucane Centre

Irish American Republicans (IAR), the murder of Peter Mc Bride and the private security contract to Lt Col Tim Spicer IAR ignore calls to support Mc Bride campaign

For some months the PFC has sought to oppose the awarding of a private security contract in Iraq to a company run by a former officer in the Scots Guards Regiment, Lt Col Tim Spicer. The US Government contract, worth $293 million, tasks London based Aegis Defence Services with the co-ordination of all private security work in Iraq for the foreseeable future. In 1992 soldiers under the command of Lt Col Spicer murdered Belfast teenager Peter Mc Bride. Spicer, their CO, subsequently lied about the circumstances of the murder, sought to blame the victim and argued that his soldiers should never have been convicted. He is a particularly unsuitable individual to be put in charge of what is essentially a large private army. On leaving the British Army Spicer set up a mercenary company, Sandline, which became embroiled in illegal activities in Papua New Guinea and Sierra Leone. Close associates have recently been jailed for mercenary activities in Africa.

Many people in the US have been horrified that such a controversial contract should be awarded to an individual who has stated that soldiers under his command who commit murder should not be subject to the rule of law. Jean Mc Bride, mother of Peter said, "Given the involvement of private security firms in torture and murder in Iraq I shudder to think that Spicer has been awarded a contract to create the world's largest private army."

In September the PFC contacted Susan Davis, President of the Washington based Irish American Republicans (IAR). Among its goals the organisation lists:

To support and encourage peace and prosperity on the island of Ireland;
To educate policy makers on issues of importance and concern;
The executive branch of IAR includes; President Bush, Vice President Cheney and Secretaries Colin Powell and Tom Ridge.

IAR clearly perceives itself to be an organisation with influence and therefore in a position to "educate policy makers on issues of importance and concern." Despite numerous emails and faxes Susan Davis has not seen fit to even reply or acknowledge our request that IAR lobby the administration on this issue of importance and concern. Given the complete wall of silence that has greeted all attempts to persuade IAR to take up this issue we can only surmise that IAR either supports this contract or does not regard it as an issue of importance and concern. Supporters of the Mc Bride family should take the matter up with Susan Davis, President of IAR, at
Email irisham@irishrepub.org Tel Wash. DC (202) 408-0808; Fax (202) 408-1231

The PFC would be interested in any responses that supporters elicit from IAR since we have been unable to do so.

See www.serve.com/pfc for extensive background on Peter Mc Bride and the Iraq contract.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hmmmm I bet this firm is connected to the Carlyle Group
and John Major plays an important part in both.

Aegis doesn't want to talk to anyone about these things, 'eh? And that Thacher twerp? Maybe mommy is pulling a string or two, eh mate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC