Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC/AP: White House memo: Pitch Social Security doom

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
mountebank Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:31 PM
Original message
MSNBC/AP: White House memo: Pitch Social Security doom
Rove aide strategy: Convince public system’s ‘heading for iceberg’

The Associated Press
Updated: 8:37 p.m. ET Jan. 5, 2005

WASHINGTON - The success of President Bush’s push to remake Social Security depends on convincing the public that the system is “heading for an iceberg,” according to a White House strategy note that makes the case for cutting benefits promised for the future.

Calling the effort “one of the most important conservative undertakings of modern times,” Peter Wehner, the deputy to White House political director Karl Rove, says in the e-mail message that a battle over Social Security is winnable for the first time in six decades and could transform the political landscape.

The White House confirmed the authenticity of the e-mail but did not have an immediate comment.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6791950/

So, was this memo leaked? The article wasn't really clear...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ogradda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. so this is what it has come to.
they out and out tell us they are going to lie to us to get what they want. hard to get any more brazen than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The sheeple are going to end up supporting this.
They always fall for these lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electric-eye Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. There must be a limit somewhere
there must be

a point at which they'll awaken

when it hits home, that's the limit

and its happening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. What a classic
1. Construct a phoney crisis
2. Come up with your equally phoney solution
3. Declare Victory
4. Pat yourself on the back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayctravis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. Bush did this in 1999
I remember they started talking down Clinton's economy. We were probably in a natural dip, but they said we needed tax cuts since the economy was good.

Then the economy got bad, and we were told we needed tax cuts. The Republicans created a recession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wabeewoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
49. I remember this
For months they were saying the economy is getting bad, is bad, we're in a recession. At the time I thought, if they keep saying it, it will happen. I couldn't understand why they were doing it at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
44. Duh
Is this why people are dying in Iraq today?
(sarcasm alert for the challenged among us)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
48. 5. sit back and blame clinton
when everything goes to sh*t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Good point
Duly noted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. These repugs are monsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think Bush will not see People fight so hard as for Social Security
If they don't let it fall on their heads!!! I want to see the Republican Party sign for its destruction and put us fiscally in insurmountable debt and say its ok the books say we are just fine


Enron this is America's creative bookeeping Enron!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. MSNBC knows we know they have this memo
Will it change how they report the social security gloom and doom.

Nope, they do not care that we know they are tools. Heck, they just hired Tucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. I figured that was what they were up to!
I heard on the radio yesterday that they were planning on removing the income cap that people pay up to on SS each year (what is it now?) and that by and large future recipients would be getting on the average 54% less than they would under this current system. The guy sitting in for Mitch Albom's show said all this (I don't know what his name is) I also don't know if what he said was accurate, but if it was, the plan is so horrendous that no one will want it and the public would obviously start screaming to do away with SS altogether.
I think the ultimate goal of bush is just to get rid of the whole system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. norquist has been saying this for years... starve the programs to death
next stop, public education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Busted!
wish it could make a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtanarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. wow, I'm suprised. that one must have slipped through...

You don't often see stories like this from major media outlets...

The public is being misled.

Methinks this story needs something of an echo chamber effect to spread awareness or it'll fizzle in the shizzle.


:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Neo-Cons are all BASTERS!!!!
I cannot stand every last one of them!!! They are all crooks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I think we need to take our own "baster"...
And use it on them while they roast over an open fire!:eyes:

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why do I feel I'm in the back seat of a coupe with a drunken mad driver,
who's either deaf or oblivious or both, careening down the road toward a certain date with an unwanted destiny?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. but all of a sudden I am hearing that some republicans are
uneasy about Bush's plan.

there is something fishy going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. So what's "Chip" Rove going to do next...
Have Mel Gibson produce a commercial invoking the Titanic hitting the iceberg to sell his point?:mad:

They'll find ELABORATE ways to lie to us about Social Security's solvency, and about their plan to demolish it. It's their plan that deserves to sink like the Titanic did, not Social Security!:grr:

This scheme of theirs needs to be sunk in Congress, and the sooner the better!

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
17. nah, this'll never work....
That's like suggesting that Congress would fall for the notion that Saddam Hussein somehow hid huge stockpiles of WMD from the U.N. inspection teams, or that he was somehow responsible for the 9/11 attacks, or.... Oh. Shit. I've got sixteen more years or so until I can retire at "full benefits."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadGimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
18. remember Karl Rove's lost and found PowerPoint slides????
The discovery of that CD put their strategy "in the water". They did not deny it.

Same game plan - different battle..

Same disinformation strategy - and again the information is true..these guys are brilliant!

1) let em know the lie (leaks work)

2) lie (with the help of a compliant media)

2) restate the lie till it becomes true in the minds of the target sudience (media agian)

It's happening all over again.

Pay attention people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yes, it does look as if they are putting that plan into play again
Probably because they were not getting enough support for their privatization, they are opening their old bag of tricks.

Without a free media those old tricks work, over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
19. And will anyone care?
I fear they will not.

Which means * has a green light to gut another program. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
22. Why is this news?
This is their MO for every policy they know the majority of the population would not support. Remember the energy crisis we were facing in 2001? Bullshit, they just wanted to drill in ANWR. The WMD? Bullshit again, they just wanted to invade Iraq. And on and on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
23. The Republicans have hated SS since
the New Deal...

right from the start, they wanted to keep people tied to the money interst so that the rich could have a giant thumb on the workers.

Oh well, I'm really really gald I don't have any kids.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
24. in other words... "Strike fear into people that they'll die penniless...
so we can rip them off."

Absolutely inexcusable (throw it on the growing pile).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
25. The lies about Iraq/WMD were just a trial run for this one
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 02:24 AM by The_Casual_Observer
This is the really big one they have been waiting for. They have confidence now, since they saw how the public was stupid enough to believe the WMD shit. They have to be stopped this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsquared Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
26. This is the lead in the online Wall St. Journal, so it isn't going away.
I think this has been leaked for a reason. In the WSJ article, Gingrich and Kemp warn that this policy will be electoral disaster for the Republicans. The difference between Bush's planned disinformation campaign on this versus, say Iraq or the environment, is that this directly affects how people live. Most may be asleep, but they are not stupid about their livelihood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. They may have leaked it as a way to gracefully back off
this campaign promise.....

Wishful thinking, I guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ally_sc Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. so it was leaked..just came over for a few
hmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
28. Geez, where have we seen THIS before?
The white House screaming "We're all gonna DIEEEEEEE!" at the top of their lungs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
29. Like it's going to make a difference. I bet a memo on torture
coming out would cause Americans to take notice...oh wait...NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. "I'd rather have a beer with W!!!!"
That's what it seemingly has come down to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. I couldn't believe the first time I heard someone say that
What idiots!

These same people went from "hold president to higher standard than myself" under Clinton, to "let's get drunk with Dubya"...

gawds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ferretherder Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. No, Solly, I think...
...the majority of 'murkins have all decided to have a LOBOTOMY with 'dubya'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Funny...yet sad and true
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corksean Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. If I had to have a beer with Bush...
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy. He can have that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #31
37. I'd rather have a beer with Dubya, because
I'd have to drink Dubya's beer for him, right? Am I right or am I right? :evilgrin:

Of course, he "could" be off the wagon ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. You're right, DS1 ........ he's off the wagon :)
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 10:30 AM by Solly Mack
and he'd make you pay for the beer to boot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #30
46. I still can't believe I heard people saying that. The truth is that W
wouldn't lower himself to having a beer with anyone who isn't one of his "business associates." That's just as well, because if I saw him sitting across the table from me, I probably wouldn't be able to keep my beer down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollowdweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
35. What will be the Democratic talking point? Call GOP "Chicken Little"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ally_sc Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. email congress again...that's the only thing that will help....
let them know how counter productive this would be. bush needs to something about the economy. if people had good jobs there would be more pay in for fica...now...no jobs , no payin. it all sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #35
50. We don't have "talking points"
we only react to theirs. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
38. The Average American
better pay attention (turn off the t.v and put down the rag paper)and get some OUTRAGE goin, cause these Aholes will pick our pockets clean.

I want OUR country back!:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
40. Thank GOD Our Glorious pResident...
...is gonna perteck us from hummasechils gittin' married, Janet Jackson's tits and Nicolette Sheridan's towel!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
42. It Will Be Like Attack Iraq BS
we heard - danger, imminent threat, old people will die
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
43. The Jeenyus is at work - this is his trademark device.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. slimballs!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
47. all the media whores got the memo
they're right on board with the iceberg thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
51. Kick, kick and kick it again.
We knew this phony crisis was being pumped up -- glad to have the evidence in their own words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
53. Welcome to the US Fascist States
From the article:
Democrats ‘Party of the Past’
“We have it within our grasp to move away from dependency on government and toward giving greater power and responsibility to individuals,” said Wehner, the director of White House Strategic Initiatives. He called the Democratic Party the “party of obstruction and opposition. It is the Party of the Past.”


Main Entry: fas·cism
Pronunciation: 'fa-"shi-z&m also 'fa-"si-
Function: noun
Etymology: Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, fasces, group, from Latin fascis bundle & fasces fasces
Date: 1921
1 : often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control <early instances of army fascism and brutality —J. W. Aldridge>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC