Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Appeals court says Bible cannot stay during appeal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:40 PM
Original message
Appeals court says Bible cannot stay during appeal
http://www.mysanantonio.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D87HHF601.html


A Bible was removed from a monument outside a Harris County courthouse Monday, complying with an order from a federal appeals court while the county appeals a federal judge's ruling that the display is unconstitutional.

Lake found that the display at the civil courthouse violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment and gave the county 10 days to remove the Bible last summer. Harris County asked the appeals court to allow the Bible to remain during its appeal.

The appeals court did not address the merits of the case, but said Monday the Bible must be removed and refused to allow the homeless mission responsible for the display to intervene in the appeal.

<snip>

Staley argued that in addition to being offensive, the Bible display improperly advanced Christianity and sent "a message to her and to non-Christians that they are not full members of the Houston political community
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is so difficult about this concept?
And what is so fragile about some people's beliefs that they're in danger without official endorsement by the state at every turn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal43110 Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Freaks who don't understand the separation of church and state
Why can't some people understand the separation of church and state? The government should not advocate any religion or display symbols of any religion or fund any religion. PERIOD.

I don't see why this is offensive to fundamentalist Christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I tried to get through to a fundie I knew fairly well a while back...
She was a very nice lady who was fundamentally unable to see how allowing her Baptist prayer in school but not allowing Islamic, or Bhuddist or Taoist or any other type of prayer was discriminatory. I tried really hard to explain that her "well they can pray quietly at their desks" claim was completely irrelevant, since many religions require a physical display (such as the Islamic prayer rug & facing towards Mecca, etc.), and that simply saying "well they can pray too, so long as it doesn't disturb the other students" was exactly the same thing she was currently being told by the courts about her Baptist prayer. I actually spent the better part of 6 months trying to reach her, and to explain that her kids are free to pray silently in school, but that to allow prayer over the intercom was both a violation of the establishment clause and by it's very nature discriminatory against students of different faiths, but I never did get through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I sympathize, Mithra61!
I tried the same talk with my in-laws - didn't get through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cool, he successfully argued that the bible was offensive. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Of course, you're assuming that his success was based on that...
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 08:10 PM by tx_dem41
argument. He made several arguments (all constitutional types do and should).

That said, I agree with the decision.

On edit: You're vs. your...sigh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Hi and No! According to the article the bible was offensive AND
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 07:55 PM by VegasWolf
encroaching on separation of church and state. That was
AND not OR. Therefore, F AND T = F, where T AND T = T.
Both of his assertions are accepted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hi to you Vegas....I can't find where the article even quotes any ..
...of the ruling, so I don't see how we can surmise what the decision was based on from this article. The writer of the article only mentions the "bible was offensive" part when addressing the plaintiff's arguments.

But, let's not drag ourselves down on technical stuff, we agree on the decision(of course I started the "dragging down"..lol).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WildClarySage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. I just ask them if they want the principal of their kid's school
leading them in a prayer to Allah, or Goddess, or Krishna, and when they say of course not (being the fundie bigots they are) remind them that if those groups ever gain the majority in America, could happen. And then gently remind them that their faith is not so fragile it cannot withstand being adhered to silently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC