Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Tells D.C. to Pay Inaugural Expenses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 09:58 AM
Original message
U.S. Tells D.C. to Pay Inaugural Expenses
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1802&u=/washpost/20050111/ts_washpost/a63896_2005jan10&printer=1

D.C. officials said yesterday that the Bush administration is refusing to reimburse the District for most of the costs associated with next week's inauguration, breaking with precedent and forcing the city to divert $11.9 million from homeland security projects.

Federal officials have told the District that it should cover the expenses by using some of the $240 million in federal homeland security grants it has received in the past three years -- money awarded to the city because it is among the places at highest risk of a terrorist attack.

But that grant money is earmarked for other security needs, Mayor Anthony A. Williams (D) said in a Dec. 27 letter to Office of Management and Budget Director Joshua B. Bolten and Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge. Williams's office released the letter yesterday.

Williams estimated that the city's costs for the inauguration will total $17.3 million, most of it related to security. City officials said they can use an unspent $5.4 million from an annual federal fund that reimburses the District for costs incurred because of its status as the capital. But that leaves $11.9 million not covered, they said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Without really knowing, doesn't DC have a few more problems
to worry about than Inaugural expenses? Most big cities have some infrastructure issues, and most likely, DC is no different. Plus, as already noted, it certainly is at a higher risk for terrorist attacks than, say, here where I live. So why don't the rich assholes who are attending pony up a few more dollars? It just doesn't seem fair for taxpayers to foot the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wisc Badger Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is really
Bush-League, and Bush-Sh*t, what a crock of Sh*t.

No wonder I am a recovering Republican, putrid, simply putrid.:puke:
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. duplicate topic, please discuss here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC