Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China puts army on Korea border

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 07:59 AM
Original message
China puts army on Korea border
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3109796.stm

The Chinese Government says it has transferred control of its border with North Korea from the police to the People's Liberation Army.


But it is refusing to confirm media reports that it has also sent 150,000 combat troops to the border area in recent weeks.

A number of Hong Kong newspapers have reported that the extra troops were being deployed to seal off the border, and put pressure on the North Korean Government to end its nuclear weapons programme.

But the timing seems more than a coincidence.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. North Korea
Is China's buffer zone. It was in 1950 and it is now. Keeps the WASP world out of Mainland China.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That hasn't been true for years
China in 1950 and China now are two totally distinct entities. North Korea is a threat to China, not a 'buffer.' Thanks to creeping capitalism, many Chinese are getting very, very rich and want to keep it that way. And the government is pretty happy with their little 'experiment' in the various trade zones. The last thing they want is instability on the Korean peninsula. Believe me, it's in China's interests to have NK enter the 21st century––maybe not as a capitalist democracy like its neighbor to the south, but at least as a more progressive communist state, rather than remaining a totalitarian Stalinist country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree
to disagree.

Ed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftistGorilla Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. same here....
during the Korean war.... The UN and American troops fought their way to the Chinese border and were met by 100,000 troops.... I have a feeling China is ready again just in case...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. So you doubt that China would aid N. Korea if they were attacked by US
or Japan or anybody. I find it hard to believe that China would turn it's back on such a long established friendship. Remember China lost a few soldiers during our Korean Conflict and they are not "over it" yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I don't think that China intends to let N. Korea be attacked by anybody ..
but China. No, they don't want U.S. soldiers on their border. But I don't think they really expect an attack, given that N. Korea may already have nukes, and Dubya's expected reluctance to attack a country that has nukes. Or, if Dubya were to attack N. Korea WITH nukes, that wouldn't be good for China, either. For too long, China kept urging the Bushistas to negotiate their problems with N. Korea, as Clinton did in 1994. I think they've finally realized that the Bushistas are incapable of doing so. It would seem to be in China's interests to 'resolve' the 'N. Korea problem.' Doing so successfully would increase their prestige in the region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScotTissue Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Absolutely agree
The Chinese are lining up against the Kim Jong Il faction, not with it. I think they see collapse and instability and want to keep it off their porch, thank you very much. Best way to do that is to pressure NK to cut the crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wondered when China would stop relying on the U.S. and take ...
action on its own to control the loose cannon on its border.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Chinese Checkers
There was a report recently of the problems China has had with North Koreans escaping into their northern provinces, not unlike the Mexican problem here. All these Koreans have escaped the "socialist paradise" of Kim Il Song and live in limbo...exploited for cheap labor with no official status. Many of these Koreans have resorted to crime to survive...and put up a big struggle if caught as they face certain death or worse (if there's such a thing) if they're deported back to the North.

I think the Chinese are hedging their bets on what's happening in the North. It appears they are just as surprised as we are to the bravado and brinksmanship the North is playing on the nukes issue.

As someone in this thread noted, China isn't the same one of 1949. It's best interests are in peace and prosperity in that entire region and their economy continues to grow. A war would devestate not only the Korean economy, but possibly send the entire Asian market down the tanks again.

China's best interests are to keep a close eye on North Korea, but they, like the rest of the outside world have little influence or real understanding of how Kim's world works. Hopefully they will cut off any and all trade...except for U.N. sanctioned food and medical shipments across the border and then we'll see how Kim reacts (especially when his supply of VSOP is cut off)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-15-03 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. China is a party to the armistice
Edited on Mon Sep-15-03 04:43 PM by teryang
While refugees from N.Korea are unwelcome, any American incursions across or north of the DMZ are not going to be taken laying down.

The sphere of influence thing does matter to Chinese leadership. The American sphere will not be allowed to increase at China's expense. N.Korea's fate is really immaterial when it comes to great power maneuvers on the Korean peninsula. Anyone who thinks "it's different now" is ignoring not only millenia of Chinese behavior but also the legacy of the 19th and 20th Centuries on Chinese attitudes toward western encroachment.

I don't know how people can think the Chinese would tolerate a territorial violation of the armistice. What will they get out of it besides a loss of prestige? This has nothing to do with the breakdown of the Agreed Framework or nuclear proliferation. In fact, one wonders whether a Chinese incursion is not possible at some point under these circumstances.

People who think it won't happen remind me of MacArthur's huge miscalculation in 1950. China has much more understanding of the North and what is going on there than anyone in our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC