Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Denies Bid to Block Inaugural Christian Prayer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:27 PM
Original message
Judge Denies Bid to Block Inaugural Christian Prayer


WASHINGTON - An atheist who tried to remove "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance lost a bid Friday to bar the saying of a Christian prayer at President Bush's inauguration.

U.S. District Judge John Bates said Michael Newdow's claim should be denied because he already had filed and lost a similar lawsuit at a federal appeals court in California last year.

Bates also said Newdow had no legal standing to pursue his claim. Even if Newdow could show he had suffered injury because he was offended in hearing the prayer, Bates said the court did not have authority to stop the president from inviting clergy to give a religious prayer at the ceremony.

"The court's grave concerns about its power to issue an injunction against the president, which is the only method of redressing Newdow's alleged injuries, places in peril Newdow's standing to bring this action," Bates wrote in his 50-page opinion.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050114/ap_on_go_pr_wh/inauguration_prayer

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. GOOD!!!
NEwdow was prancing for the cameras, nothing else.

His case had no merit whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah, his 15 minutes are just about up
Still, it would have been tremendous fun to watch him win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. You know, Walt's going to find out who you are.
And this is going to be the last time you steal his password. He'll change it every week if that's what he has to do to keep you guessing. Your days are numbered!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. you should know me well enoough by now
I calls 'em as I sees 'em.

This case had no merit. The audience is not forced (unlike school prayers). The inaugural procedures are accomodating George W. Bush, not me, you, Newdow, or anybody else, ergo it's his inauguration, nobody else's.

Under the free exercise clause, the government cannot put undue restraints upon the free exercise of religion by governmental employees. This is why in the military, chaplains must be provided at taxpayer expense as a societal regime is established by the necessities of military operations.

The same sort of argument applies in this case. Newdow's arguments are tanamount to complaining about presidents receiving secret service protection while they are in church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bono71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Agree 100% n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shleonny Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. chaplains are wrong too
the government should not be in the service of religious institutions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bono71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I agree with the point that a short prayer at this type of
ceremony does not "establish" a religion...it's not like the government or the administration is passing a law that states we all have to worship Jayzus or some dern thing...like Saudi Arabia...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shleonny Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. it's a tax payer funded religous exercies
it is establishment, stop trying to deny it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LwOrder4 Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. well put
I totally agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. That was quick
What was it... like 8 hours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dustoff034 Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. As I said elsewhere - Newdow is a tinfoil hat wearing dumbass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. it was a silly case
Edited on Fri Jan-14-05 04:37 PM by unblock
there are far stronger similar cases, such as for removing "in god we trust" from our money or for banning morning prayer from the start of each congressional day. not that any such case would go anywhere either.

since the inauguration is mostly paid for out of private funds, there's far less demonstrable injury, nor is it a clear-cut governmental wrong.

in theory, yes, citizens should be allowed to witness the inauguration without being subjected to any state-sponsored religious speech, but, then, there's no constitutional provision requiring a public inauguration anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Actually I would disagree about the "mostly private funds"
Such as Bush forcing DC to foot 17 million bucks from their Homeland security funds, funds which were meant for firefighters and other projects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. i agree there are plenty of governmental expenses
but isn't there $40MM of bribeprivate money being spent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Last I heard they were short of the forty mill
and panicking! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. well that's a damn shame.
NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizMoonstar Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. my young man wants to be president someday, and...
he wants to have a Daoist ceremony just to watch the born-agains shit. They assume that only 'tacky un-American atheists' don't want to hear about Jesus. I support atheists, but they're not alone. As a pagan universalist, I don't want to be forced to hear it either!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. You win some, you lose some, BUT...
how does Michael Newdow NOT have standing in this case? He's a citizen, and it's his government. This is an official government exercise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. He is not compelled to listen to the inauguration
He's not a captive audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shleonny Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. but he is compelled to help pay for it
how much is this costing U.S. taxpayers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bono71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. But, how does the recital of a 2 minute prayer "establish"
Christainity as a state religion...

granted when you have a school room full of impressionable kids, you could have a problem with indoctrination...but this seems very different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shleonny Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. it doesn't matter how long it is
it matters that it is tax payer funded, and that the office is the highest political office in the country. It is establisment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCRUBDASHRUB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Welcome to DU, shleonny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxRoadHawg Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. Oh but he is!
We all pay, pay for the military whether we want one or not, we pay for the civil servant bureaucracies weather we want them or not, we pay for the city, state, federal budget and what ever they want to spend it on, weather we want to or not.

So what's your point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
35. All taxpayers are paying for is the security
and we pay for the security for him to attend church, too.

No difference between the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LwOrder4 Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. Don't listen to it, don't watch it
change the channel etc etc I heard he's going to appeal. It's hard to believe this yahoo ever passed the bar!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bono71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Take it from me, it ain't that hard to pass. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxRoadHawg Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
33. so we should all change to suit one person?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Are these people in the picture O.K.?
It looks like they had a bad meal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. LOL!
Funny post. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
26. Best solution
Everyone do their own prayer, hex, curse, whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
29. Like Newdow was going to watch the inauguration, anyway.
He has become a nuisance and a champion of himself. Taking bets as to what his next ploy will be.
...O...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
30. Newdow makes me ashamed to be an Atheist.
His school prayer case was a good cause. THIS....Is nothing more than Don Quixote having a go at a windmill, IMO.

Don't listen to the fucking prayer. Just be glad we aren't going to be forced to witness the "Bonesman" ceremony or whatever the Bilderburgers have planned to mark the ocassion....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
31. I'm kinda hoping this will finally give
the big guy upstairs the chance to send a bolt of lighting down on the whole administration for using religion to further their nefarious cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dand Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
34. Good boy Newdow, you speak for me and all other Atheists.
Why should I have to pay for this mumbo jumbo. This slimy little prick is no more a Christian than I am, when he takes the "oath" he will be laughing his ass off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC