Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Cut in Medicare Payments to Hospitals Advised (by federal panel)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:40 AM
Original message
NYT: Cut in Medicare Payments to Hospitals Advised (by federal panel)
Cut in Medicare Payments to Hospitals Is Advised
By ROBERT PEAR

Published: January 18, 2005


WASHINGTON, Jan. 17 - An influential federal advisory panel has voted to recommend a cut in Medicare payments promised to hospitals and a freeze in payments to nursing homes and home care agencies in 2006.

The recommendations to Congress, approved by the panel last week, give powerful support to Republican lawmakers and Bush administration officials who want to curb soaring Medicare costs, as part of their overall effort to reduce the federal budget deficit....

***

Because of a new mandate from Congress, the panel drafted its recommendations to reward the most efficient hospitals, doctors and clinics. In effect, panel members said, Medicare payments have to be adequate to cover the costs of an efficiently run hospital, but not necessarily all the costs of an average or typical hospital....

***

Carmela S. Coyle, senior vice president of the American Hospital Association, said: "We are very disappointed. The commission's own data show that the financial condition of hospitals is worsening and that hospitals lose money treating Medicare patients."...


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/18/politics/18medicare.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. In an aging population they plan to freeze payments to
nursing homes and home health care agencies? Medicare payments has to be adequate to cover the costs of an efficiently run hospital, but not necessarily all the costs of an average or typical hospital? (such as might exist out in the hinterlands where hospitals are not all that plentiful and actually being able to get to one alive can sometimes be an issue?)

This doesn't make sense unless the only consideration is cost, not life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. From the article (deficit policy not Medicare policy) --
"Ms. Coyle said, 'Congress may use this recommendation as a rationale for budget cuts that address the deficit, not Medicare policy.'"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I think Republicans would just as soon round old and disabled people
up and turn them into soylent green.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. they should freeze medicare payments to for profit hospitals chains
like the kind that the Frist family has gotten rich off of ....or at least investigate them for high price setting, etc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Screwing the poor!
That is all this is about. In an attempt to run "more efficiently" they will cut on some test or procedures I bet. Save lots of money in the process and put lives at risk. More importantly who uses Medicare? The poor, or should I say the un-affluent. It is all about screwing the poor, class warfare at its finest. It goes right along with this administrations old Testament idea of God blesses the righteous with material goods, and the poor are that way because they are not saved etc.... I hate this administration for its Calvanist, old testament, fundamentalist view of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Saves" up to 6 billion dollars?
Who do they think it saves? How much of that will be passed on to those of us paying unbearable premiums? I already feel like an idiot paying for insurance I can't afford to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. WTF is an "efficient" hospital?? One that doesn't serve poor
people or those without insurance?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC