Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New doubts on Social Security plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 11:34 PM
Original message
New doubts on Social Security plan
Hill Republican seeks broader review of system
By Mike Allen and Jonathan Weisman
Updated: 10:56 p.m. ET Jan. 18, 2005


House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Thomas (R-Calif.) predicted yesterday that partisan warfare over Social Security will quickly render President Bush's plan "a dead horse" and called on Congress to undertake a broader review of the problems of an aging nation.

Thomas, one of Capitol Hill's most powerful figures on tax policy, is the highest-ranking House Republican official to cast doubt on the president's plan for creating individual investment accounts. He said that as an alternative, he will consider changes such as replacing the payroll tax as Social Security's financing mechanism and adding a savings plan for long-term or chronic care as "an augmentation to Social Security payments."

"What I'm trying to get people to do is get out of the narrow moving around of the pieces inside the Social Security box," Thomas said at a forum on Bush's second term sponsored by the National Journal. "If we miss this opportunity . . . I think we will have missed an opportunity that may not present itself for another 20 years."

Bush's plan for allowing younger Americans to divert a third or more of their payroll taxes into private investment accounts to enhance their long-term benefits has drawn fire from Democrats, who say it is a risky step toward partial privatization of Social Security. Many Republicans have expressed reservations about the political wisdom of Bush's vision for restructuring the nearly 70-year-old retirement and income security program, and Thomas's comments will fuel the controversy.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6841171/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Show this to the women -- "Gender-adjusted benefits?"
from the article:

Gender-adjusted benefits?

Perhaps most provocatively, Thomas said lawmakers should debate whether Social Security benefits should differ for men and women, because women live longer. "We never have debated gender-adjusting Social Security," he said. A House leadership official said that not even Republicans on Thomas's committee would vote for that idea. Thomas also said the system might take into account the need of blue-collar workers to retire younger than office workers.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. If woman are forced to secret abortions
that'll sure show'em they better not live longer! </sarcasm>

WTF is wrong wtih these people? (No need to answer...is a rhetorical question...)

Let's waste time in bringing an "aging nation" (from the article), into the 21st Century by debating over shit like this while more Americans are going hungry, ending up homeless, in need of medical care...but hey! Let's debate over the issue of who wins more and what do those who have a shorter life span get outta this social security "deal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. And that means? That they'll "cut" Women's benefits?
Anticipating that they MIGHT live longer? And that (as 2nd-class citizens in Neo-Con eyes) we intimidate easily...as evidenced by our right to "Choose"...which we keep losing control over again and again due to "old white men."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. It's called sexism, hey if the overturn Roe V Wade then maybe
women will die sooner. Break out the coathangers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. They're already "gender-adjusted" by virtue of our lower pay over time.
Bastards. When we're making 100% of men's wages, then they can talk...in the meantime...

I'll give 'em something to 'gender-adjust'. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
3.  "a dead horse"
Too bad these assholes didn't wise up to the chimp 2 years ago, we wouldn't be in such deep shit in Iraq now. Iraq will be the downfall of the dunce in chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm praying for the dead horse.
...House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Thomas (R-Calif.) predicted yesterday that partisan warfare over Social Security will quickly render President Bush's plan "a dead horse"...

May the dead horse win!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. A tipping of the ol' mug for all dead horses everywhere
Edited on Wed Jan-19-05 01:53 AM by Bozita
... especially this one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. We'll drink a stirrup cup
to the dead horse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Problem 100 million and a few Bill for Iraq and Social Security 0
how does a congressman sign onto that !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. And the last Rep. from CA who headed W&M died of cancer recently,
remember? I'll believe the "standing up" when I actually see it.

Call me jaded, but I'm still in shock from Kerry's rolling-over to Condi R today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockedthevoteinMA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Kerry's rolling over? I thought he voted no?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC