Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tax Breaks Intensify State Fiscal Debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
True_Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 12:49 AM
Original message
Tax Breaks Intensify State Fiscal Debate
SACRAMENTO — As Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger seeks to force down government expenses, his blueprint for long-term reform leaves one area untouched: tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations.

The tax breaks allow yacht owners to avoid paying sales taxes, business partnerships to keep their property tax bills down and large corporations to move money offshore to avoid paying what would otherwise be owed to the state.

Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez suggests closing such loopholes could wipe out as much as half of the state's $8.6-billion deficit. Analysts say such projections are far too optimistic, but they question the governor's refusal to even look at the tax breaks.

"There are a lot of people in California who are not asked to bear any of the burden of balancing this budget," said John Ellwood, a professor of public policy at UC Berkeley. "The governor has made a policy choice. He is willing to hit the poor more than the upper middle class and the rich."

More....
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-loophole24jan24,0,6980202.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. If he's not careful, this could be a start of Recall Part II
If Gray Davis was kicked out for being fiscally irresponsible in driving the state into debt, if he's going to keep us in debt by not being responsible in making everyone pay their fair share, he perhaps should face the same music.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wrong, because the California media will defend Arnold forever
Even if the LA Times dares to allow a few people to question Arnold in this article, they will run 10 other pro-Arnold articles to tell Californians how great he is.

Gray Davis was destroyed by the California media with the same fury they use to defend Arnold and vilify anyone who would dare stand up against him.

Arnold is to the California media what Bush is to the National media - glorious and perfect.

To question Arnold is nearly treason if you follow the California media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Davis was Recalled ONLY because powers-that-be wanted a Repug (Arnold)
Everything else was just an excuse.

The State wanted to push through Workers' Comp reform, and Overtime Laws (which Davis had reversed), and clearly Anti-Gay, Anti-Abortion agendas which they needed pushed through quick. And redistricting for 2006...so that California miraculously turns Blue in the near future under Arnold's lead.

I really don't believe it was EVER about Davis OR the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh, I agree totally!
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 02:12 AM by calipendence
But, the *rationalization* for getting rid of him was that he put us into debt, even though we know that we're the big sponge the feds led by Bushco like to soak for the rest of the welfare states that helped put us into "the red" to start with.

I was just noting that if their rationalization worked to get him out, then turnabout's fair play, and we can use the same rationalization that Arnold's not being fiscally responsible if he's not asking everyone to pay their fair share to get the state out of debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. But Arnold played on something very tangible
The "car tags". He did not mention that it was put out there by Pete Wilson, no, he only said he would reverse it. He can have loop holes and people object less to paying more than somebody else. They seem to object more to paying increased fees and taxes then they do to paying a higher percentage than somebody else. Raising the amount taken out of a pay check can be directly attributed to Arnold, having local sales tax and property tax increase is not directly related to him and most people won't think about it beyond the end of their nose.

The car tags increase was directly related to a Gray Davis decision, coupled with a bad budget and he lost. Arnold is willing to screw the people, just not directly. I think that is the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC